Project

General

Profile

Actions

action #88514

open

[virtualization][ipmi] Test incomplete sometimes due to de-activate a already "deactivate" status SUT.

Added by XGWang0 almost 4 years ago. Updated almost 4 years ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
Low
Assignee:
-
Category:
Feature requests
Target version:
QA (public, currently private due to #173521) - future
Start date:
2021-02-10
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:

Description

Sometimes, the test is failed by incomplete, because ipmi backend executes deactivate operation on a "deactivate" status SUT.

Error info "Reason: backend died: ipmitool -I lanplus -H 10.67.135.44 -U root -P susetesting sol deactivate: Info: SOL payload already de-activated at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/backend/ipmi.pm line 65. "

Test case:http://openqa.qa2.suse.asia/tests/28722

Actions #1

Updated by okurz almost 4 years ago

  • Project changed from openQA Infrastructure (public) to openQA Tests (public)
  • Subject changed from [IPMI] Test incomplete sometimes due to de-activate a already "deactivate" status SUT. to [virtualization][ipmi] Test incomplete sometimes due to de-activate a already "deactivate" status SUT.
  • Category set to Bugs in existing tests

This can at best be fixed in tests though. The problem only happens if the connection was already terminated in before.

Actions #2

Updated by XGWang0 almost 4 years ago

  • Project changed from openQA Tests (public) to openQA Infrastructure (public)
  • Category deleted (Bugs in existing tests)

okurz wrote:

This can at best be fixed in tests though. The problem only happens if the connection was already terminated in before.

Sometimes, the fix still need to be fixed in ipmi backend, eg SUT reboot operation, which ipmi backend will "reset" connection, this operation will invoke "ipmitool deactivate" and trigger this issue.

Actions #3

Updated by okurz almost 4 years ago

  • Project changed from openQA Infrastructure (public) to openQA Project (public)
  • Category set to Feature requests
  • Priority changed from Normal to Low
  • Target version set to future

Well, I am not exactly sure if I understand you correctly. However I would agree that the ipmi backend can improve the error handling. That would be within the project "openQA Project" though. I doubt there is anything we can do from infrastructure side. So changing the project for the ticket accordingly.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF