tickets #61644
closedproxy.o.o outage looks like a routing problem
0%
Description
I have interesting[tm] news - the proxy.o.o problems/outage we currently see could be a routing problem.
Currently I can't reach it from my home ("connection refused") with the following route:
traceroute bugs.opensuse.org
traceroute to bugs.opensuse.org (195.135.221.140), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 2.723 ms 2.712 ms 2.732 ms
2 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1) 10.598 ms 10.609 ms 10.593 ms
3 xxxxx-isp.superkabel.de (83.169.183.xxx) 28.054 ms 28.820 ms 30.822 ms
4 ip5886eb6b.static.kabel-deutschland.de (88.134.235.107) 31.753 ms 30.838 ms 31.723 ms
5 * * *
6 * * *
7 ae0-429.fra20.core-backbone.com (81.95.2.153) 43.173 ms 34.977 ms 33.792 ms
8 ae2-2001.nbg30.core-backbone.com (81.95.15.161) 39.778 ms 27.665 ms 27.917 ms
9 core-backbone.microfocus.com (5.56.18.210) 34.328 ms 36.828 ms 35.711 ms
10..30 * * *
The interesting thing is that I can reach it from a Hetzner rootserver, which seems to have a more direct connection (see hop 4 - and BTW, please fix the lowercase u ;-)
traceroute bugs.opensuse.org
traceroute to bugs.opensuse.org (195.135.221.140), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 static.xxxxx.clients.your-server.de (88.99.101.xxx) 0.286 ms 0.276 ms 0.329 ms
2 core22.fsn1.hetzner.com (213.239.245.241) 0.316 ms core21.fsn1.hetzner.com (213.239.245.237) 0.194 ms core22.fsn1.hetzner.com (213.239.245.241) 0.305 ms
3 juniper5.nbg1.hetzner.com (213.239.252.237) 2.930 ms 2.927 ms 2.921 ms
4 GigE-0.SuSE.DHK.N-IX.net (195.85.217.20) 2.713 ms 2.709 ms 2.704 ms
5..30 * * *
Updated by cboltz over 4 years ago
- Status changed from New to Closed
Closing, since the problem seems to be gone.
For the records: I just switched static.o.o back from CNAME login2.o.o (which I had setup as a workaround) to CNAME proxy.o.o. Strictly speaking, this is different than before because originally static.o.o was 195.135.221.143 / 2620:113:80c0:8::18, which are two additional IPs on anna/elsa. I don't see a real need to have static.o.o on a different IP, therefore I use CNAME proxy.o.o now.
Updated by tampakrap over 4 years ago
Indeed, there is no need for a different IP for static.o.o. It was on a different IP because it was not behind the proxy in the past. Since it moved to the proxy though, the extra IP can simply go away