action #55346

packaging test as part of every PR

Added by okurz 7 months ago. Updated 4 months ago.

Status:ResolvedStart date:11/08/2019
Priority:NormalDue date:
Assignee:coolo% Done:

0%

Category:Feature requests
Target version:Current Sprint
Difficulty:
Duration:


Related issues

Related to openQA Project - action #43619: Improve workflow for dealing with openQA's dependencies Blocked 09/11/2018
Related to openQA Project - action #53546: Easier dependencies handling for packages, e.g. reduce du... Blocked 27/06/2019

History

#1 Updated by coolo 7 months ago

  • Assignee set to coolo

#2 Updated by coolo 4 months ago

  • Status changed from New to Feedback
  • Target version set to Current Sprint

I put this in place - let's see how fast we remove it again as it's taking too long :)

#3 Updated by coolo 4 months ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Resolved

Seems to work fine

#4 Updated by okurz 4 months ago

Could you please share a bit of details what you have done so that we can learn from it for the potential application on other projects as well as know how to handle it in case of your unavailability?

#5 Updated by okurz 4 months ago

  • Related to action #43619: Improve workflow for dealing with openQA's dependencies added

#6 Updated by okurz 4 months ago

  • Related to action #53546: Easier dependencies handling for packages, e.g. reduce duplication of build requirements in spec, documentation, Dockerfile added

#7 Updated by coolo 4 months ago

Git clone https://github.com/coolo/pull_request_package/tree/for_openqa
docker build -t puller_for_openqa .
Create puller-config

Run /usr/bin/docker run --rm -v=/suse/coolo/prod/openQA/puller-config:/config -t puller_for_openqa:latest from systemd timer

#8 Updated by okurz 4 months ago

cool. Do you agree that we should do the same for os-autoinst? … and for every other package of openSUSE:Factory linked to spec file sources on github? Should we run it on botmaster or maybe a k8s cluster?

Also available in: Atom PDF