Project

General

Profile

Actions

action #45116

closed

[functional][y] Try to find better names for version control functions instead of e.g. "is_storage_ng_newui"

Added by okurz over 5 years ago. Updated almost 5 years ago.

Status:
Rejected
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Enhancement to existing tests
Target version:
SUSE QA - Milestone 30+
Start date:
2018-12-13
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Difficulty:


Related issues 1 (0 open1 closed)

Related to openQA Tests - coordination #44054: [functional][y][epic] Develop maintainable and scalable test frameworkResolvedriafarov2018-11-202019-05-21

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by okurz over 5 years ago

  • Related to coordination #44054: [functional][y][epic] Develop maintainable and scalable test framework added
Actions #2

Updated by okurz about 5 years ago

  • Target version set to Milestone 25
Actions #3

Updated by riafarov almost 5 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Rejected
  • Assignee set to riafarov

I guess it's resolved by new test framework which allows us to have good control on which components are in the given product. Like TW has version a and SLE 12 has b, once SLE 12 gets updated, we can simply switch and make factory return other version.
In case you feel it's not resolved - let's discuss.
is_storage_ng_newui is awfull version control, yet another hack, so +1 to motivation =)

Actions #4

Updated by riafarov almost 5 years ago

  • Target version changed from Milestone 25 to Milestone 30+

No reply on jira, moving to 28+, as not happening before SP2 most likely.

Actions #5

Updated by okurz almost 5 years ago

Well, I am agreeing that the new test framework is a good way to solve this however the code currently still has a big amount of occurences of "is_storage_ng_newui". However, I think this is mainly a technical debt to consider within the team so I leave the handling of the request solely to you :)

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF