Project

General

Profile

Actions
Copy link

action #30886

closed

[sle][functional][autoyast][medium] adjust btrfs tests according to the new requirements

Added by riafarov almost 7 years ago. Updated almost 7 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
High
Assignee:
riafarov
Category:
Bugs in existing tests
Target version:
openQA Project (public) - Milestone 14
Start date:
2018-01-29
Due date:
2018-02-13
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Difficulty:

Description

Observation

With recent changes now services create subvolumes themselves. This changes expectation for storage-ng for btrfs autoyast test.

See bsc#1076329 bsc#1076321 bsc#1076335 bsc#1076337

openQA test in scenario sle-15-Installer-DVD-x86_64-autoyast_btrfs@64bit fails in
verify_autoinst_btrfs

Reproducible

Fails since (at least) Build 327.1

Expected result

Last good: (unknown) (or more recent)

The test module "verify_autoinst_btrfs" already failed in build 404.1. okurz could not find a "last good".
Pasting last good from SLE12SP4: https://openqa.suse.de/tests/1408204

Suggestions

  • Update tests/autoyast/verify_autoinst_btrfs.pm with new expectations based on new requirements

Further details

Always latest result in this scenario: latest

Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by riafarov almost 7 years ago

  • Subject changed from [sle][functional][medium] adjust btrfs tests accrding to the new requirements to [sle][functional][autoyast][medium] adjust btrfs tests accrding to the new requirements
Actions
Copy link
 #2

Updated by okurz almost 7 years ago

  • Subject changed from [sle][functional][autoyast][medium] adjust btrfs tests accrding to the new requirements to [sle][functional][autoyast][medium] adjust btrfs tests according to the new requirements
  • Due date set to 2018-02-13
  • Priority changed from Normal to High
  • Target version set to Milestone 14
Actions
Copy link
 #3

Updated by okurz almost 7 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)

@riafarov can you help to find a "last good"? I did not find a job in the same scenario that would either reach or pass the test module verify_autoinst_btrfs

Actions
Copy link
 #4

Updated by riafarov almost 7 years ago

  • Assignee set to riafarov
Actions
Copy link
 #5

Updated by riafarov almost 7 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
  • Status changed from New to In Progress
Actions
Copy link
 #6

Updated by riafarov almost 7 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Feedback

As per discussion in bsc#1076337, btrfs_set_default_subvolume_name
option is obsoleted and subvolumes_prefix option will be used instead.
Whereas bug is still there and option is not added when there is no
prefix.

PR: https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/pull/4335

Actions
Copy link
 #7

Updated by riafarov almost 7 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
Actions
Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF