Actions
action #297
closed
Test Tesseract as a better OCR
Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Development
Target version:
Start date:
2013-04-15
Due date:
2013-04-16
% Done:
100%
Estimated time:
6.00 h
Description
Is good and fast as a ORC?
Updated by aplanas over 10 years ago
- Assignee set to aplanas
- Category set to Development
- Estimated time set to 4.00 h
- Target version set to T03. Remove the MD5 approach and create a new API semantic
Updated by aplanas over 10 years ago
- Assignee changed from aplanas to cwh
- Due date set to 2013-04-15
- Estimated time changed from 4.00 h to 6.00 h
- Start date changed from 2013-04-03 to 2013-04-14
Updated by aplanas over 10 years ago
- Due date changed from 2013-04-15 to 2013-04-16
- Start date changed from 2013-04-14 to 2013-04-15
Updated by coolo over 10 years ago
devel:openQA has tesseract packages, but I didn't even install them. Bernhard said tesseract was too complex for him to setup - let's see :)
Updated by lnussel over 10 years ago
as per offline discussion yesterday we decided that it's more important to have an "ocr" area which overlaps task 313
Updated by lnussel over 10 years ago
- Assignee changed from cwh to lnussel
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
I've implemented automatic ocr using tesseract on ocr areas. waitforneedle now contains the ocr result.
Updated by lnussel over 10 years ago
- Status changed from New to In Progress
I cannot close this as resolved
Updated by lnussel over 10 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
Actions