action #297
Test Tesseract as a better OCR
Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Development
Target version:
Start date:
2013-04-15
Due date:
2013-04-16
% Done:
100%
Estimated time:
6.00 h
Description
Is good and fast as a ORC?
History
#1
Updated by aplanas about 9 years ago
- Assignee set to aplanas
- Category set to Development
- Estimated time set to 4.00 h
- Target version set to T03. Remove the MD5 approach and create a new API semantic
#2
Updated by aplanas about 9 years ago
- Assignee changed from aplanas to cwh
- Due date set to 2013-04-15
- Estimated time changed from 4.00 h to 6.00 h
- Start date changed from 2013-04-03 to 2013-04-14
#3
Updated by aplanas about 9 years ago
- Due date changed from 2013-04-15 to 2013-04-16
- Start date changed from 2013-04-14 to 2013-04-15
#4
Updated by coolo about 9 years ago
devel:openQA has tesseract packages, but I didn't even install them. Bernhard said tesseract was too complex for him to setup - let's see :)
#5
Updated by lnussel about 9 years ago
as per offline discussion yesterday we decided that it's more important to have an "ocr" area which overlaps task 313
#6
Updated by lnussel about 9 years ago
- Assignee changed from cwh to lnussel
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
I've implemented automatic ocr using tesseract on ocr areas. waitforneedle now contains the ocr result.
#7
Updated by lnussel about 9 years ago
- Status changed from New to In Progress
I cannot close this as resolved
#8
Updated by lnussel about 9 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
#9
Updated by aplanas about 9 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Closed