Project

General

Profile

Actions

action #179963

closed

[tools][organisational] Team split - split backlog queries

Added by okurz 20 days ago. Updated 12 days ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Low
Assignee:
Start date:
2024-10-07
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:

Description

Motivation

With two teams "dev" and "infra" we should also split backlogs as referenced on team pages and backlog status view.

Acceptance Criteria

  • AC1: primary entry points on team wiki and status page are team specific

Suggestions


Related issues 3 (1 open2 closed)

Copied from QA (public) - action #167884: [tools][organisational] Reconsider team composition size:SResolvedokurz2024-10-07

Actions
Copied to QA (public) - action #179966: [tools][organisational] Team split - additional scrum master size:SResolvedtinita2024-10-072025-04-23

Actions
Copied to QA (public) - action #180764: [tools][organisational] Team split - clear definition of infra and dev scopes size:SFeedbacklivdywan2025-05-01

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by okurz 20 days ago

  • Copied from action #167884: [tools][organisational] Reconsider team composition size:S added
Actions #2

Updated by okurz 20 days ago

  • Copied to action #179966: [tools][organisational] Team split - additional scrum master size:S added
Actions #3

Updated by okurz 16 days ago

https://github.com/os-autoinst/qa-tools-backlog-assistant/pull/51 as a first step to mention dev+infra backlogs.

Actions #4

Updated by livdywan 14 days ago

  • Target version changed from Tools - Next to Ready

This is required for #167884 and #179966 to be implemented.

Actions #5

Updated by okurz 14 days ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress
  • Assignee set to okurz
Actions #6

Updated by okurz 14 days ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Feedback
Actions #8

Updated by livdywan 13 days ago

  • Copied to action #180764: [tools][organisational] Team split - clear definition of infra and dev scopes size:S added
Actions #9

Updated by okurz 13 days ago ยท Edited

some ideas from a collab session

  • dev should be about community
  • infra is "SUSE internal"

maybe "openQA" is not such a bad name for "dev" :) For some o3 would better belong to infra. Why I mentioned o3 mostly refers to "everything above the base OS layer" so something like continous deployment of os-autoinst+openQA and monitoring the openQA instance itself. Not "kernel upgrades of the OS". "qem-dashboard" is a free software project and "development" and might fit better in dev however okurz argues that most of the work in that domain is understanding the very SUSE specific requirements and interconnections with qem-bot, smelt, IBS, OSD, and alike. We can add a "disclaimer" and also mention that in doubt we all collaborate :)

Actions #10

Updated by okurz 12 days ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Resolved

I hope I managed to incorporate the necessary changes into https://progress.opensuse.org/projects/qa/wiki/Tools#How-we-work for now

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF