action #158742
open
- Description updated (diff)
- Tags changed from qe-yam-apr-sprint to qe-yam-may-sprint
- Status changed from Workable to In Progress
- Assignee set to hjluo
- Tags changed from qe-yam-may-sprint to qe-yam-jan-sprint
- Tags changed from qe-yam-jan-sprint to qe-yam-jun-sprint
could you please update state here? thanks.
- Now run on 15sp3 without workaroudn
apply_workaround_bsc1206132()
it still
failed with yast2 iscsi-client' didn't finish or exited with non-zero
.
Test died: 'yast2 iscsi-client ' didn't finish or exited with non-zero code
- Now asking Lee Duncan if it is expected or not for that product. (sent mail and wait for his reply)
Mail exchange:
Hi Lee,
We are now revisiting bugbsc#1206132
and found it still in sles15sp3 MU update builds. https://openqa.suse.de/tests/14654652
From https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206132#c22 I found that we do not push open-iscsi fix to sles15sp3.
So my question is if this is expected or not for sles15sp3? do we have any plan to push this fix to sles15sp3 to make it work for our Yast MU testing?
Thanks a lot.
Lee Duncan replied with:
Please re-open the bug and request a port for SLE-15-SP3. That should
be no problem.
- Tags changed from qe-yam-jun-sprint to qe-yam-jul-sprint
- Now we're wait the dev for a port for SLE-15-SP3 which he agreed.
- Tags changed from qe-yam-jul-sprint to qe-yam-aug-sprint
- Status changed from In Progress to Workable
hjluo wrote in #note-11:
- Now we're wait the dev for a port for SLE-15-SP3 which he agreed.
For informative purpose, please, write in the last message of the bug that you are requesting a port and you have agreed offline with developers about it (it is confusing to use so many tools, so we need to be clear for anyone reading the bug).
I'm moving to August sprint to revisit and keep you assigned.
Also available in: Atom
PDF