Project

General

Profile

Actions

action #135401

closed

[security] fips pattern missing because basesystem repository not available

Added by tjyrinki_suse 8 months ago. Updated 5 months ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Bugs in existing tests
Target version:
-
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
8.00 h
Difficulty:
Tags:

Description

openQA test in scenario sle-15-SP6-Online-x86_64-fips_env_stunnel_server@64bit fails in
fips_setup

Fails since (at least) Build 19.1 (current job)

Last good: 16.1 (or more recent)

First thought to be a product problem, developer explained that
as this you install with the Online medium, you need to enable the Basesystem Pool repository.

Comparing a passing run at https://openqa.suse.de/tests/11979771#settings to now failing run at https://openqa.suse.de/tests/12036081#settings , it seems the failing run is here where there are 50+ repository related settings that did not exist for the passing one.

Looking further back to 15-SP5 - https://openqa.suse.de/tests/11175701#settings - it seems the new case of having all of those settings would be the right way, but the question for this ticket is why it does not work?

Actions #1

Updated by JERiveraMoya 8 months ago

according to logs:

[2023-09-07T12:25:11.461464+02:00] [debug] [pid:87738] <<< distribution::script_output("script failed with : \nL_NVX\nSUSEConnect error: Get \"http://all-19.1.proxy.scc.suse.de/connect/systems/activations\": dial tcp: lookup all-19.1.proxy.scc.suse.de: i/o timeout\nSCRIPT_FINISHEDL_NVX-1-")

so we cannot connect the reg server and we don't match any of the code paths (see variable matching $sc_out in test_repo_setup.pm) so to remediate it throw us to the path of adding the dvd repo,
so we never reach the normal path of registration, https://openqa.suse.de/tests/11979771#step/test_repo_setup/20
seems unrelated with settings, now we have correct settings like in previous GMC.
the path of adding the dvd doesn't work of course, because we use iso for the Online medium which doesn't have the base repo, we would need to schedule this in Full while MM is fixed, which probably doesn't worth it.

There are issues with MM not being able to reach outside, perhaps better work on this ticket when things are more clear.

Actions #2

Updated by JERiveraMoya 8 months ago

  • Status changed from Workable to Blocked

Blocked by the MM issue (poo#134282](https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/134282)

Actions #3

Updated by openqa_review 7 months ago

This is an autogenerated message for openQA integration by the openqa_review script:

This bug is still referenced in a failing openQA test: fips_ker_mode_Firefox
https://openqa.suse.de/tests/12305300#step/fips_setup/1

To prevent further reminder comments one of the following options should be followed:

  1. The test scenario is fixed by applying the bug fix to the tested product or the test is adjusted
  2. The openQA job group is moved to "Released" or "EOL" (End-of-Life)
  3. The bugref in the openQA scenario is removed or replaced, e.g. label:wontfix:boo1234

Expect the next reminder at the earliest in 28 days if nothing changes in this ticket.

Actions #4

Updated by openqa_review 6 months ago

This is an autogenerated message for openQA integration by the openqa_review script:

This bug is still referenced in a failing openQA test: fips_ker_mariadb_ssl_client
https://openqa.suse.de/tests/12506113#step/fips_setup/1

To prevent further reminder comments one of the following options should be followed:

  1. The test scenario is fixed by applying the bug fix to the tested product or the test is adjusted
  2. The openQA job group is moved to "Released" or "EOL" (End-of-Life)
  3. The bugref in the openQA scenario is removed or replaced, e.g. label:wontfix:boo1234

Expect the next reminder at the earliest in 56 days if nothing changes in this ticket.

Actions #5

Updated by tjyrinki_suse 5 months ago

  • Status changed from Blocked to Workable

The related p.o.o is now resolved.

The topic itself - FIPS repo seems available now, so this ticket is maybe no longer valid? It's "just" that everything FIPS fails as documented at bsc#1216059.

Actions #6

Updated by JERiveraMoya 5 months ago

tjyrinki_suse wrote in #note-5:

The related p.o.o is now resolved.

The topic itself - FIPS repo seems available now, so this ticket is maybe no longer valid? It's "just" that everything FIPS fails as documented at bsc#1216059.

I agree, feel free to resolve it without assignee or reject it, how you would normally do.

Actions #7

Updated by tjyrinki_suse 5 months ago

  • Status changed from Workable to Closed
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF