Project

General

Profile

Actions

action #111329

closed

coordination #80142: [saga][epic] Scale out: Redundant/load-balancing deployments of openQA, easy containers, containers on kubernetes

coordination #81060: [epic] openQA web UI in kubernetes

openQA within kubernetes with tested helm charts size:M

Added by okurz almost 2 years ago. Updated over 1 year ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Low
Assignee:
Category:
Feature requests
Target version:
Start date:
2022-05-19
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:

Description

Motivation

In #110524 a proof-of-concept has shown that it's feasible to have helm charts for an openQA webui+worker kubernetes cluster. To have something supported and maintainable we should have helm charts within our openQA repo (or a related repo) with at least static helm chart tests

Acceptance criteria

  • AC1: Tested helm charts for openQA workers in a repo maintained by us

Suggestions

Actions #1

Updated by tinita almost 2 years ago

  • Subject changed from openQA within kubernetes with tested helm charts to openQA within kubernetes with tested helm charts size:M
  • Status changed from New to Workable
Actions #2

Updated by jbaier_cz almost 2 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)

Updated suggestions according what I found during making the PoC

Actions #3

Updated by jbaier_cz almost 2 years ago

  • Status changed from Workable to In Progress

I will happily take it :)

Actions #4

Updated by jbaier_cz almost 2 years ago

  • Assignee set to jbaier_cz
Actions #5

Updated by jbaier_cz almost 2 years ago

https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/4650 is updated to contain some enhanced linting and test installation

Actions #6

Updated by jbaier_cz almost 2 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Feedback

Features are merged so subsequent tests should also tests the Charts we added in earlier commits.

Actions #7

Updated by jbaier_cz over 1 year ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Resolved

We had a couple of PR after this one, the test seems to be running and passing. We can probably continue with #81060

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF