Actions
action #107005
closedcoordination #109668: [saga][epic] Stable and updated non-qemu backends for SLE validation
coordination #109656: [epic] Stable non-qemu backends
coordination #105699: [epic] 5 whys follow-up to s390x svirt jobs incomplete with unable to extract assets:.*/var/lib/libvirt/images/a.img" size:S
Automatic review checklists on pull requests, especially for os-autoinst non-qemu backend tests
Description
Motivation¶
Acceptance criteria¶
- AC1: Pull requests introducing changes to non-qemu os-autoinst backends have a review checklist so that reviewers do not forget such changes need to be tested accordingly
Suggestions¶
- One important factor for myself (okurz) is that I keep forgetting or overlooking certain things in reviews because I review in multiple different projects and for each I need to look for different things, e.g. in openQA I can usually trust the automated test assuming that there are according tests added and code coverage is fine, for os-autoinst I would need to carefully try myself or ask for tests, for openQA test distributions I would need to look for according openQA verification jobs. I suggest we look for "review checklists". I am thinking of a bot like mergify that responds to pull requests with a review checklist that we can tweak per project and then reviewers can cross off the individual points of that checklist.
Updated by okurz almost 3 years ago
- Copied from action #106999: os-autoinst: Document the use of custom openQA backend commands to test os-autoinst changes on production workers size:M added
Updated by tinita almost 3 years ago
https://github.com/marketplace/actions/contextual-qa-checklists looks promising (based on file paths)
alternative based on keywords in diff: https://github.com/marketplace/actions/dynamic-checklist
Updated by okurz almost 3 years ago
- Due date set to 2022-03-03
- Status changed from New to Feedback
Updated by okurz over 2 years ago
- Due date deleted (
2022-03-03) - Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
merged and effective. Working fine in https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst/pull/1958#issuecomment-1044231841
Actions