action #154687
Updated by syrianidou_sofia 3 months ago
The particular test module is supposed to select sda disk for root partition. This used to be an adequate solution as the disk naming for virt-mm-64bit-ipmi worker_class SUTs was stable. Lately this has changed and we see SUTs with sda being too small for a root partition or no sda at all. **Acceptance criteria** - Verify with infra/Yast/kernel infra/Yast team what is if the expected random naming for of the particular arch. disks is expected - If the expected doesn't apply not open an infra ticket/Bug report. ticket / Bug report - If it applies, yes, adjust the test not to have the flexibility to select depend on a particular name but any partition big enough disk for root partition (In case it gets too complex, discuss with PO) enough. ## Observation openQA test in scenario sle-15-SP6-Online-x86_64-guided_btrfs@virt-mm-64bit-ipmi fails in [accept_default_part_scheme](https://openqa.suse.de/tests/13394667/modules/accept_default_part_scheme/steps/2) ## Test suite description Guided Partitioning installation with btrfs filesystem. ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [47.2](https://openqa.suse.de/tests/13319724) ## Expected result Last good: [20.1](https://openqa.suse.de/tests/12205773) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.suse.de/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=sle&flavor=Online&machine=virt-mm-64bit-ipmi&test=guided_btrfs&version=15-SP6)