action #126179

Updated by livdywan about 1 year ago

## Motivation 
 Feedback from hsehic: We have some presentations referencing a openQA DSL, "Domain specific language" but doesn't mention it anywhere. we should just mention the term in or near or so that people find it as search term 

 ## Acceptance criteria 
 * **AC1:** The documentation mentions "openQA DSL" 

 ## Suggestions 
 * Just add a sentence that explains that the openQA test API can be referred to as openQA DSL, because in some contexts it can look like a domain specific language 
 * Comparable examples from the Perl world would be the Mojolicious::Lite DSL, or cpanfiles 

 ## Remark 
 You can run generic Perl code in tests. We should not give a false impression about it. This is merely so our documentation isn't blank on the term "DSL" that may be used elsewhere.