action #125237
Updated by mkittler about 1 year ago
## Observation So it looks like the problem first mentioned in https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst/pull/2260#issuecomment-1448414226 shows up in other pull requests as well now. Who can understand why codecov says that we have 99.28% coverage in the "fully_covered" section as configured in https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst/blob/master/codecov.yml#L18 even though https://app.codecov.io/gh/os-autoinst/os-autoinst/pull/2270/tree shows all referenced paths to be covered by 100%? ## Steps to reproduce Seems to happen in all pull requests that are either opened anew or updated ## Acceptance criteria * **AC1:** It is known why the actual percentage doesn't match the expected 100% ## Suggestions * Bisect like it is done in https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst/pull/2271 and similar PRs * Click on "View details" in merged PRs to see the checks