action #119584
Updated by JERiveraMoya over 1 year ago
#### ## Observation openQA test in scenario sle-15-SP5-Full-ppc64le-select_modules_and_patterns+registration@ppc64le-hmc-single-disk fails in [select_patterns](https://openqa.suse.de/tests/9842439/modules/select_patterns/steps/125) In select_pattern the 'yast-development' was not matched, added a needle and it's still not want to match it. need further checking. The problem is ## Test suite description Full Medium installation that with covers the new workaround we exit earlier following cases: 1. Additional modules enabled using SCC (Legacy, Development Tools, Web and we don't do the last iteration in the case we want to process the last item. We need to fix this logic, one clear hint to discover that was that we use one of the return code but not the other, when the code Scripting, Containers, Desktop Applications); 2. Yast patterns installed; 3. System registration is not uniform skipped during installation; 4. Installation is easy to miss the strange logic validated by successful boot and that could be going on, specially in old test modules. #### Acceptance criteria **AC1**: Automation YaST does not report any issues; 5. Registration is able to process performed on the last item for pattern selection **AC2**: Other products or test suites not failing are not affected by the change. installed system. ## Reproducible #### Additional information Fails since (at least) Build [32.1](https://openqa.suse.de/tests/9823494) ## Expected result Last good: [29.1](https://openqa.suse.de/tests/9757504) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.suse.de/tests/latest?arch=ppc64le&distri=sle&flavor=Full&machine=ppc64le-hmc-single-disk&test=select_modules_and_patterns%2Bregistration&version=15-SP5) - Both retcodes should be taken into account for new algorithm to process iterative the patterns. - Meanwhile YaST developers are trying to fix this old issue with scroll that we need to workaround and it is not a bug and more like an accepted design defect.