action #73165

Updated by okurz about 1 year ago

## Motivation
We learned in that vdc is already cheap+slow so we have vde now but that does not seem to make sense to me anymore. We worked based on wrong assumptions it seems :)

## Acceptance criteria
* **AC1:** It is obvious from system descriptions, mount point names, documentation and/or salt states which storage is "cheap+slow" and which is "expensive+fast"

## Suggestions
* Extend existing storage with help from SUSE IT (waiting for , then resizing existing filesystem)
Optional: Get rid of vde again and merge with vdc* vdc
Change existing mount points to include "fast" or "slow" as well
* Look for other places where we can describe the current status and specifications, e.g. salt states, progress (or confluence)