Project

General

Profile

action #99333

qa-maintenance/openQABot CI job fails after max retries to reach germ159.suse.cz

Added by okurz 2 months ago. Updated 18 days ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Low
Assignee:
Target version:
Start date:
2021-09-27
Due date:
2022-01-31
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:

Description

Observation

https://gitlab.suse.de/qa-maintenance/openQABot/-/jobs/609314#L177 fails after max retries to reach germ159.suse.cz. Why does openQABot even try to reach that host?

Steps to reproduce

Failed multiple times during the past days, e.g. in

likely every job for PTFs (L3) is failing.

Problem

  • Why do we even try to reach that host? This seems to be related to PTFs, see update/ptf.py

Suggestions

Rollback steps

History

#1 Updated by okurz 2 months ago

  • Description updated (diff)
  • Due date set to 2021-10-11
  • Status changed from New to Feedback
  • Assignee set to okurz

I asked in both https://suse.slack.com/archives/C02CANHLANP/p1632727549039300 as well as https://suse.slack.com/archives/C02CCRM8946/p1632727556148600 about the host. The host has been added hardcoded in source in

commit 383dcc0
Author: Ondřej Súkup <osukup@suse.com>
Date:   Thu Apr 29 23:43:45 2021 +0200

    L3's PTF in openQA

so there is no more information about the meaning, owner, maintainer, etc.

Found https://confluence.suse.com/display/~alnovak/QA+on+PTFs and commented there: https://confluence.suse.com/display/~alnovak/QA+on+PTFs?focusedCommentId=836468797#comment-836468797

#2 Updated by okurz about 2 months ago

  • Due date changed from 2021-10-11 to 2021-10-27
  • Priority changed from Normal to Low

No response. Apparently not a high priority topic as no one else asked about that. Lowering priority. I asked in https://suse.slack.com/archives/C02CANHLANP/p1633882791180500 , bumping due date

#3 Updated by okurz about 1 month ago

  • Due date changed from 2021-10-27 to 2022-01-31

There was a response in https://confluence.suse.com/display/~alnovak/QA+on+PTFs?focusedCommentId=849117581#comment-849117581 by Petr Pavlu. We can expect a new machine providing the data eventually. Setting due-date accordingly.

#5 Updated by okurz 18 days ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Resolved

yes, looks all good. Thanks.

Also available in: Atom PDF