Project

General

Profile

Actions

action #97403

closed

coordination #91646: [saga][epic] SUSE Maintenance QA workflows with fully automated testing, approval and release

openQA Project - coordination #91467: [epic] Surface openQA failures per squad in a single place

openqa-review: Polish job group section titles in todo-only mode size:S

Added by okurz over 2 years ago. Updated over 2 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Target version:
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:

Description

Motivation

#91467#note-42

Acceptance criteria

Suggestions

Actions #1

Updated by okurz over 2 years ago

  • Subject changed from openqa-review: Polish to openqa-review: Polish job group section titles in todo-only mode
Actions #2

Updated by okurz over 2 years ago

  • Subject changed from openqa-review: Polish job group section titles in todo-only mode to openqa-review: Polish job group section titles in todo-only mode size:S
  • Status changed from New to Workable
Actions #3

Updated by kodymo over 2 years ago

  • Assignee set to kodymo
Actions #4

Updated by mkittler over 2 years ago

  • Status changed from Workable to In Progress

If you create a PR you can reference it like this:


PR: https://github.com/os-autoinst/openqa_review/pull/178

Actions #5

Updated by kodymo over 2 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Feedback
Actions #6

Updated by kodymo over 2 years ago

Changes are merged in Git, waiting for deployment.

Actions #7

Updated by kodymo over 2 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
Actions #8

Updated by okurz over 2 years ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to Feedback

hi, have you looked at https://openqa.io.suse.de/openqa-review/openqa_suse_de_todo_only.html ? It looks much better but there is a minor flaw in the first section header which is not indented the same way as the following. I suggest to indent both the same way, either indent the first one or ensure that the others are not indented

Actions #9

Updated by okurz over 2 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Resolved

The follow-up PR was https://github.com/os-autoinst/openqa_review/pull/179 which is in production and looks just fine. Thank you! Next time you can happily resolve the ticket yourself as soon as such requirements are met

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF