Project

General

Profile

Actions

action #174547

closed

Ensure wasserstoff+atomkraft are properly used or designated as unused size:S

Added by okurz 2 months ago. Updated 8 days ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Start date:
2025-02-14
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Tags:

Description

Motivation

Based on #174265-12 wasserstoff+atomkraft might currently not be used by QE UV squad. Also our internal loan period expires on 2024-12-31. We should ensure that wasserstoff+atomkraft are properly used or designated as unused

Acceptance criteria

  • AC1: racktables entries are up-to-date for wasserstoff+atomkraft

Suggestions

  • Sync with UV squad about current use of machines
  • Ensure racktables entries are up-to-date for wasserstoff+atomkraft

Files


Related issues 1 (0 open1 closed)

Copied from QA (public) - action #128498: ARM server for UV squad (was: Requesting a quote for two Ampere Altra Servers to be used for various testing efforts inside the department) size:MResolvedokurz2023-05-02

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by okurz 2 months ago

  • Copied from action #128498: ARM server for UV squad (was: Requesting a quote for two Ampere Altra Servers to be used for various testing efforts inside the department) size:M added
Actions #3

Updated by okurz 2 months ago

  • Description updated (diff)
  • Target version changed from Ready to Tools - Next
Actions #4

Updated by okurz 22 days ago

  • Target version changed from Tools - Next to Ready
Actions #5

Updated by gpathak 18 days ago

  • Subject changed from Ensure wasserstoff+atomkraft are properly used or designated as unused to Ensure wasserstoff+atomkraft are properly used or designated as unused size:S
  • Status changed from New to Workable
Actions #6

Updated by robert.richardson 12 days ago

  • Assignee set to robert.richardson
Actions #7

Updated by robert.richardson 11 days ago

  • Status changed from Workable to In Progress
Actions #8

Updated by openqa_review 11 days ago

  • Due date set to 2025-02-26

Setting due date based on mean cycle time of SUSE QE Tools

Actions #9

Updated by robert.richardson 11 days ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved

I have talked to @pluskalm, who is listed as the contact for both machines. Although the UV Squad is currently not using them, they most likely have a use case for both machines.

So i am leaving the contact information in place for now and extending the loan period by 6 months.

Actions #10

Updated by okurz 10 days ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to Workable

robert.richardson wrote in #note-9:

extending the loan period by 6 months.

and what will happen in 6 months then?

Actions #11

Updated by livdywan 10 days ago

@robert.richardson Could you a ticket on the UV backlog with some notes on whatever you discussed? Otherwise the machines will probably be forgotten again 😉

Actions #12

Updated by robert.richardson 9 days ago

  • Status changed from Workable to In Progress
Actions #13

Updated by robert.richardson 9 days ago · Edited

I'm talking to @opithart who is currently trying to set up the machines, though is running into issues when trying to boot SLES 15-SP6

Any ideas whats causing this issue ?
so far he tried:

  • resetting the bios to default settings
  • kernel parameter efi=debug but got no output
  • kernel parameter efi=noruntime
  • changing multiple secureboot parameters

okurz wrote in #note-10:

robert.richardson wrote in #note-9:

extending the loan period by 6 months.

and what will happen in 6 months then?

Thats why i asked in chat yesterday what the default procedure for this is, and if i should simply extend it by some months. I don't know.

livdywan wrote in #note-11:

@robert.richardson Could you a ticket on the UV backlog with some notes on whatever you discussed? Otherwise the machines will probably be forgotten again 😉

We havent really discussed anything other than what i've already wrote. I asked if UV is using the machines, he said no but they would/could, i said ok, updated racktables and provided the IPMI credentials.

I now asked if they already have a ticket regarding the machines (Edit: not yet) that i can link here for reference and additionally i can create a checkup ticket for us (i would do that here in progress) to once again check on the machines when the loan period ends.

Actions #14

Updated by robert.richardson 9 days ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Feedback
Actions #15

Updated by robert.richardson 9 days ago

We have decided against another "checkup" ticket in the daily, and that the loan period is likely to short, so i've increased it to 3 years for both machines in question.

Regarding the mentioned setup issues, @opithart was able to boot ubuntu and noticed that both SFP+ interfaces are down (one of them has the SFP+ transciever present).
As the UV squad has no direct access to FC, i offered we can help with that, although i asked him to create a seperate ticket for it.

Actions #16

Updated by opithart 8 days ago

  • Subtask #177264 added
Actions #17

Updated by opithart 8 days ago · Edited

I have just now created a subtask ticket #177264 like @robert.richardson asked me to.

Actions #18

Updated by okurz 8 days ago

  • Subtask deleted (#177264)
Actions #20

Updated by robert.richardson 8 days ago · Edited

opithart wrote in #note-17:

I have just now created a subtask ticket #177264 like @robert.richardson asked me to.

Thanks, 'm assigning the new ticket to myself and resolving this one.

Actions #21

Updated by robert.richardson 8 days ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF