Actions
action #128990
closedtest fails in validate_btrfs - misconfigured filesystem layout for s390x
Status:
Resolved
Priority:
High
Assignee:
Category:
Bugs in existing tests
Target version:
Start date:
2023-05-09
Due date:
% Done:
0%
Estimated time:
Difficulty:
Tags:
Description
Observation¶
openQA test in scenario sle-12-SP4-Server-DVD-Updates-s390x-docker_tests@s390x-kvm-sle12 fails in
validate_btrfs
Test suite description¶
The base test suite is used for job templates defined in YAML documents. It has no settings of its own.
After introducing an AY profile for mru-install-minimal-with-addons@s390x-kvm-sle12
we are dealing with BTRFS storage driver failures in container updates testing queue.
The last successful job was using attended YaST2 deployment.
Current fs layout in AY without /var
:
susetest:~ # df -hT
Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
devtmpfs devtmpfs 990M 0 990M 0% /dev
tmpfs tmpfs 998M 0 998M 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs tmpfs 998M 9.4M 989M 1% /run
tmpfs tmpfs 998M 0 998M 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/vda2 btrfs 38G 2.0G 34G 6% /
/dev/vda2 btrfs 38G 2.0G 34G 6% /.snapshots
/dev/vda1 ext2 294M 30M 249M 11% /boot/zipl
tmpfs tmpfs 200M 0 200M 0% /run/user/0
susetest:~ # btrfs subvolume list /
ID 257 gen 11 top level 5 path @
ID 258 gen 37 top level 257 path @/.snapshots
ID 259 gen 85 top level 258 path @/.snapshots/1/snapshot
ID 261 gen 19 top level 259 path var/lib/machines
ID 263 gen 34 top level 258 path @/.snapshots/2/snapshot
Reproducible¶
Fails since (at least) Build 20230504-1
Expected result¶
Last good: 20230503-1 (or more recent)
Further details¶
Always latest result in this scenario: latest
Updated by rfan1 over 1 year ago
- Tags set to bugbusters
- Status changed from Workable to In Progress
- Target version set to QE-Core: Ready
I will try to update the autoyast configuration file with right
partition settings.
Updated by rfan1 over 1 year ago
Updated by rfan1 over 1 year ago
- Related to action #128732: [qem][qe-core] many tests failed due to PR #16919 added
Actions