tickets #113803
closednews.o.o. server (bug)
0%
Description
For some reason, the news.o.o. server isn't pickup up the latest article I published https://github.com/openSUSE/news-o-o/blob/84e3ff96b2f85996c6176c764cc76feca5a70494/_posts/2022-07-18-microos-desktop-use-to-help-with-alp-feedback.md.
The previewer picks it up https://news-o-o-preview.netlify.app/, but news.o.o seems to not be able to pick it up.
Sasi and I had something similar happen back at the end of May. https://github.com/openSUSE/news-o-o/commit/1fbdaf96f97d00c9e5faebe9b4ccfe4d04bf1ce3
Updated by cboltz over 2 years ago
- Tracker changed from communication to tickets
- Status changed from New to Resolved
Just checked - the article appeared in the meantime :-) so whatever was broken seems to be accidentally fixed in the meantime.
Updated by ddemaio over 2 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Feedback
- Assignee set to cboltz
Not sure, but it looks like the article I published for today is also experiencing the same issue. Guess we will see if it accidentally fixes itself. :-)
Updated by cboltz over 2 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
It did fix itsself, and based on your comment here (at 9:03 UTC, article not yet published) and on github (at 10:24 UTC, article published) I'd even say that nothing was broken - the article had date: 2022-07-20 10:00:00+10:00
. Looks like jekyll ignores the timezone part and always assumes UTC (or the server timezone, which is UTC in the openSUSE infrastructure).
For completeness, I'll copy&paste my comment on https://github.com/openSUSE/news-o-o/commit/aaed68b93c073824e5efdc2ab4e939e212dde866#commitcomment-78957898 here:
Well, I remember from the manual jekyll run yesterday that the article was intentionally skipped because of date: 2022-07-20 10:00:00+10:00 which (as of yesterday) was a date in the future.
So if you schedule an article to be published on a specific future date, you shouldn't be too surprised if jekyll honors this ;-)
BTW: The +10:00 doesn't look like an european timezone, not sure if that was intentional.