action #94600
Updated by geor almost 3 years ago
## Motivation The `Results from openQA incidents jobs:` section in a maintenance update's test the log shows, as one would expect, the incident jobs related to the incident that is to be tested. It can happen that engineers testing the incident fall under the impression that the openQA coverage shown in the log is the complete openQA test coverage for that incident. It should thus be communicated that the `openQA incident jobs` section does not show the complete test coverage of the incident in openQA, but only a subset of it (the other being in aggregate runs that test the incident). This should clarify to the engineers that the absence of failed incident jobs in the log does not mean necessarily that there are no other failed jobs related to the incident. ## Acceptance criteria * **AC1:** Communicate that the jobs listed in the log of an update are not the complete set of jobs that test that update ## Suggestions * One suggestion could be to remove that section from the log and instead link the incident comments (eg https://maintenance.suse.de/incident/19067/#comments) where all jobs related to that incident are listed.