Project

General

Profile

Actions

action #136055

closed

[qe-core] test fails in bootloader_start

Added by amanzini about 1 year ago. Updated about 1 year ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Bugs in existing tests
Target version:
Start date:
2023-09-19
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Difficulty:

Description

Observation

openQA test in scenario sle-15-SP1-Server-DVD-Incidents-Minimal-s390x-qam-minimal-full@s390x-zVM-vswitch-l3 fails in
bootloader_start

Test suite description

Testsuite maintained at https://gitlab.suse.de/qa-maintenance/qam-openqa-yml. minimal = base pattern, minimal (enhanced base) pattern are additional convenience paclkages

Reproducible

Fails since (at least) Build :30363:zypper-lifecycle-plugin

Expected result

Last good: :30602:shadow (or more recent)

Further details

Always latest result in this scenario: latest

First observation

looking at a working test https://openqa.suse.de/tests/12050494 seems that bootparam file is downloaded via FTP from $REPO_HOST=10.145.10.207
this failing test has REPO_HOST=10.160.0.207, need to investigate the reason and fix

Actions #1

Updated by amanzini about 1 year ago

forcing REPO_HOST to 10.145.10.207, the system boots https://openqa.suse.de/tests/12189442#live

$ openqa-clone-job https://openqa.suse.de/tests/12170027 --skip-chained-deps  --host=openqa.suse.de  REPO_HOST=10.145.10.207 TEST=amanzini BUILD=amanzini _GROUP=487 _GROUP_ID=487
Actions #2

Updated by amanzini about 1 year ago

  • Assignee set to amanzini
Actions #3

Updated by amanzini about 1 year ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress
Actions #4

Updated by amanzini about 1 year ago

trying to use DNS name for REPO_HOST

openqa-clone-job https://openqa.suse.de/tests/12170027 --skip-chained-deps --host=openqa.suse.de REPO_HOST=openqa.suse.de TEST=amanzini BUILD=amanzini _GROUP=487 _GROUP_ID=487 -> https://openqa.suse.de/tests/12203628

Actions #5

Updated by amanzini about 1 year ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Feedback

At the end we can always use DNS name here, but we are also exposing to risk of depending on that service (seems in the past we experienced slow response?). What do you think ?

Actions #6

Updated by amanzini about 1 year ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF