action #35494: eliminate duplicate binaries - openSUSE Leap 15.0 - openSUSE Project Management Tool

a) Presumably the same problem exists when src packages are published with same name so does this make sense to ignore? Understandably the src packages are less "important" since they are not used in other builds nor typically by end users, but the underlying problem exists.

b) Same note as other tools ignoring -debug* packages. Clearly this would be a problem when installing them, but perhaps only interested in one entry?

Actions

Copy link

Updated by jberry almost 6 years ago

AS for the special self.ignore_extra_archs, should all parch != arch be ignored? Why just those packages? Is the OBS behavior "define" in general for that rule and they should always be ignored?

Actions

Copy link

Updated by lnussel almost 6 years ago

parch != arch is the special for i686 IIRC, those packages end up in a different directory by means of export filter IIRC. OBS black magic

src packages are less important, yes. Because they are not used for building. In OBS it's especially nasty if the package used for building changes all the time. maybe there needs to be a separate warning category for those. same for debug packages. I would live with overlaps there for now but really need to fix the real binary packages.

Actions

Copy link

Updated by jberry almost 6 years ago

It appears the hd5-examples duplicates is another stale binary case: https://github.com/openSUSE/open-build-service/issues/4373#issuecomment-384756318

Actions

Copy link

Updated by jberry almost 6 years ago

Status changed from New to Feedback
% Done changed from 0 to 100

Created two pull requests to improve duplicate checking tool:

Updated output:

i586:
blacs-devel-headers:

scalapack:gnu-openmpi-hpc
scalapack:mvapich2
scalapack:openmpi
scalapack:gnu-mvapich2-hpc hdf5-examples:
hdf5:serial
hdf5:gnu-hpc luaposix-doc:
lua-luaposix:lua51
lua-luaposix:lua53 x86_64: blacs-devel-headers:
scalapack:mvapich2
scalapack:openmpi fonttools:
python-FontTools
fonttools luaposix-doc:
lua-luaposix:lua51
lua-luaposix:lua53 mpv-plugin-mpris:
lua-lua-mpris:lua53
lua-lua-mpris:lua51 soapysdr0.6-module-airspy:
soapy-airspy
soapy-osmo soapysdr0.6-module-bladerf:
libxtrx
soapy-bladerf soapysdr0.6-module-hackrf:
soapy-hackrf
soapy-osmo

Resolutions:

delete openSUSE:Leap:15.0/fonttools in favor of python-FontTools
submit science/scalapack to only build blacs-devel-headers during one flavor
submit devel:languages:lua/lua-luaposix to only produce docs during one flavor
submit devel:languages:lua/lua-lua-mpris to only produce mpv-plugin-mpris during one flavor
submit hardware:sdr/soapy-osmo to append -osmo suffix to packages in conflict and add conflicts meta
submit hardware:sdr/libxtrx to append -libxtrx suffix to packages in conflict and add conflicts meta

Presumably the update crawler will propigate these once they hit Factory.

Actions

Copy link

#10

Updated by lnussel almost 6 years ago

Status changed from Feedback to New
% Done changed from 100 to 90

very nice, thanks! I'll keep it open to check again next week. maybe those submit requests need pushing

Actions

Copy link

#11

Updated by lnussel almost 6 years ago

I can't get around doing that myself. Can you check again and just close when finished?

Actions

Copy link

#12

Updated by jberry almost 6 years ago

bumped sr#601660 (science/scalapack to only build blacs-devel-headers during one flavor) pending devel project acceptance.
submit openSUSE:Factory/lua-luaposix to only produce docs during one flavor

All other issues are shown as resolved.

Actions

Copy link

#13