Activity
From 2021-07-04 to 2021-08-02
2021-08-02
- 16:23 action #95221: Provide more people with administrative access to services on qam2.suse.de, at least qa-maintenance/openQABot, i.e. increase bus factor size:M
- I have a promising PoC GitlabCI at https://gitlab.suse.de/jbaier_cz/openQABot/-/jobs/516115
- 15:08 action #95989 (Resolved): openqa-review gitlab CI pipeline jobs fail with "AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'group'"
- what I meant with "If we know of an issue with a ticket point to the ticket for users to follow": In openqa-review re...
- 10:32 action #88127: [tools][qem] Test coverage DB for maintenance updates
- jbaier_cz wrote:
> If you agree, it might be worth to resurrect some of the mentioned poo's back to live.
Definit... - 09:27 action #88127: [tools][qem] Test coverage DB for maintenance updates
hurhaj wrote:
> Let's try something easier first, look at https://qam.suse.de/testreports/SUSE:Maintenance:20432:2...- 08:34 action #88127: [tools][qem] Test coverage DB for maintenance updates
- Let's try something easier first, look at https://qam.suse.de/testreports/SUSE:Maintenance:20432:245401/log for suppo...
- 07:55 action #88127: [tools][qem] Test coverage DB for maintenance updates
- From my point of view, looking at http://qam.suse.de/testreports/SUSE:Maintenance:19738:241935/log
**AC1** is cove... - 06:49 action #88127 (Feedback): [tools][qem] Test coverage DB for maintenance updates
- I've checked several test reports currently in the queue and it looks like only AC3 was met, list of tests that are n...
- 08:39 action #96359: Improve openqa-review generation: Learn Gitlab CI pipelines
- As discussed with tinita let's focus on on task at a time which is #96350
- 08:39 action #96356: Improve openqa-review generation: Try to preserve old reports if individual new ones can not be generated
- As discussed with tinita let's focus on on task at a time which is #96350
- 08:39 action #96353: Improve openqa-review generation: If individual reports can not be generated, mention that as well with an explicit message
- As discussed with tinita let's focus on on task at a time which is #96350
- 08:38 action #96362 (Feedback): Improve openqa-review generation: Passthrough all vars and use git managed file for config
- @dheidler as you already created a MR assigning to you. Please work out with Jan and others how to continue as soon a...
2021-07-30
- 21:24 action #94027 (Rejected): MTUI - traceback when connecting unavailable refhost
- > Feel free to close the issue. I will reopen if I manage to reproduce again.
Yes, sounds good. Please do so. - 20:21 action #94027: MTUI - traceback when connecting unavailable refhost
- Hello.
I am no longer able to reproduce the issue.
I am using he development version of MTUI, so this was probabl... - 13:50 action #94027 (New): MTUI - traceback when connecting unavailable refhost
- we need better "steps to reproduce" before we could fix the issue
- 10:55 action #95989: openqa-review gitlab CI pipeline jobs fail with "AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'group'"
- okurz wrote:
> * If we know of an issue with a ticket point to the ticket for users to follow
I don't understan... - 09:47 action #95989: openqa-review gitlab CI pipeline jobs fail with "AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'group'"
- Ideas from weekly:
* Add a date on the index page when reports were generated
* If individual reports can not be ... - 10:51 action #96362: Improve openqa-review generation: Passthrough all vars and use git managed file for config
- There is already a merge request by Dominik: https://gitlab.suse.de/openqa/openqa-review/-/merge_requests/10
- 10:50 action #96362 (Resolved): Improve openqa-review generation: Passthrough all vars and use git managed file for config
- ## Observation
When a openqa-review pipeline fails, reports will only partially generated.
This is a followup t... - 10:47 action #96359 (New): Improve openqa-review generation: Learn Gitlab CI pipelines
- ## Observation
When a openqa-review pipeline fails, reports will only partially generated.
This is a followup t... - 10:45 action #96356 (Resolved): Improve openqa-review generation: Try to preserve old reports if individual new ones can not be generated
- ## Observation
When a openqa-review pipeline fails, reports will only partially generated.
This is a followup t... - 10:44 action #96353 (Resolved): Improve openqa-review generation: If individual reports can not be generated, mention that as well with an explicit message
- ## Observation
When a openqa-review pipeline fails, reports will only partially generated.
This is a followup t... - 10:43 action #96350 (Resolved): Improve openqa-review generation: Add date to index size:S
- ## Observation
When a openqa-review pipeline fails, reports are only partially generated.
This is a followup to... - 09:24 action #96016 (Resolved): [oscqam] Traceback on running ibs qam assigned -G qam-manager
2021-07-29
- 15:58 action #96314: [mtui] Update MTUI to use new format for Testplatform
- Just to clarify more, not only those two types of testplaforms are generated by slightly different algorithms, they a...
- 15:51 action #96314 (New): [mtui] Update MTUI to use new format for Testplatform
- Currently templates contain metadata for example:
Testplatform: base=HPC(major=15,minor=);arch=[x86_64]
Testplatf... - 11:16 action #81192 (Workable): [tools] Migrate (upgrade or replace) qanet.qa.suse.de to a supported, current OS size:M
- 11:16 coordination #94105 (Workable): [epic] Use feedback from openqa-investigate to automatically inform on github pull requests, open tickets, weed out automatically failed tests
- In the weekly estimation meeting we decided that for an epic it's actually "Workable" because we don't need to estima...
- 11:15 coordination #95857 (Workable): [epic] QAM incident tests: Fix "next & previous", latest results and label carry-over
- In the weekly estimation meeting we decided that for an epic it's actually "Workable" because we don't need to estima...
- 11:07 coordination #69310 (Workable): [epic] SUSE QA tools team ticket process helpers
- In the weekly estimation meeting we decided that for an epic it's actually "Workable" because we don't need to estima...
2021-07-28
- 12:37 action #95989: openqa-review gitlab CI pipeline jobs fail with "AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'group'"
- We decided as a team e.g. in #91674 that we can find more than just a single fix whenever we encounter issues. So we ...
- 09:18 action #93522: [tools][qem] auto-approval of kgrafts and live-patches
- merged , so for now should be LP in own projects only with 'qam-openqa' and LTSS with 'qam-kernel' + 'qam-openqa'
- 08:32 action #93522: [tools][qem] auto-approval of kgrafts and live-patches
- https://gitlab.suse.de/tools/smelt/-/merge_requests/730
- 08:22 action #93522: [tools][qem] auto-approval of kgrafts and live-patches
> >
> > (as real kernel updates have an initial livepatch)
>
> no, it was not intended. and although it might ...- 08:36 action #91356: Save openqa-review reports as gitlab CI artifacts
- eng infra for custom domain tracking https://jira.suse.com/browse/ENGINFRA-724
2021-07-27
- 13:57 action #95989: openqa-review gitlab CI pipeline jobs fail with "AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'group'"
- @okurz I don't get what you mean, can you help me?
- 11:44 action #95989 (Feedback): openqa-review gitlab CI pipeline jobs fail with "AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'group'"
- please consider from our https://progress.opensuse.org/projects/qa/wiki/Wiki#Definition-of-DONE : "For regressions: A...
- 04:09 action #95221: Provide more people with administrative access to services on qam2.suse.de, at least qa-maintenance/openQABot, i.e. increase bus factor size:M
- Setting due date based on mean cycle time of SUSE QE Tools
2021-07-26
- 21:47 action #95989 (Resolved): openqa-review gitlab CI pipeline jobs fail with "AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'group'"
- pipeline successful
- 15:59 action #95989: openqa-review gitlab CI pipeline jobs fail with "AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'group'"
- PR was merged, I triggered a pipeline: https://gitlab.suse.de/openqa/openqa-review/-/pipelines/176225
- 09:54 action #95989 (Feedback): openqa-review gitlab CI pipeline jobs fail with "AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'group'"
- PR: https://github.com/os-autoinst/openqa_review/pull/173
- 08:53 action #95989 (In Progress): openqa-review gitlab CI pipeline jobs fail with "AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'group'"
- 08:35 action #95989 (Resolved): openqa-review gitlab CI pipeline jobs fail with "AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'group'"
- ## Observation
https://gitlab.suse.de/openqa/openqa-review/-/jobs/507143 and others:
```
Traceback (most recen... - 14:25 action #96016 (Resolved): [oscqam] Traceback on running ibs qam assigned -G qam-manager
- Please see [bsc#1188711](https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188711)
- 11:13 action #95221: Provide more people with administrative access to services on qam2.suse.de, at least qa-maintenance/openQABot, i.e. increase bus factor size:M
- okurz wrote:
> jbaier_cz wrote:
> > We already have this, the keys for root access are stored inside ansible reposi... - 10:42 action #95221: Provide more people with administrative access to services on qam2.suse.de, at least qa-maintenance/openQABot, i.e. increase bus factor size:M
- #### Options
##### User access to the container
Enhance Ansible role to deploy additional user account and allo... - 10:13 action #95221: Provide more people with administrative access to services on qam2.suse.de, at least qa-maintenance/openQABot, i.e. increase bus factor size:M
- jbaier_cz wrote:
> We already have this, the keys for root access are stored inside ansible repository.
There had... - 09:54 action #95221 (In Progress): Provide more people with administrative access to services on qam2.suse.de, at least qa-maintenance/openQABot, i.e. increase bus factor size:M
- As this seems to be pretty important lately, I will jump into this and investigate our possibilities.
Just for the...
2021-07-22
- 12:27 action #93522 (Feedback): [tools][qem] auto-approval of kgrafts and live-patches
- @osukup can you please look into this and state if it's feasible to achieve? If the original benefit can not be achie...
- 11:44 coordination #95857: [epic] QAM incident tests: Fix "next & previous", latest results and label carry-over
- maybe worth to discuss the general idea and concept e.g. during a SUSE QE Tools workshop. TODO make it an epic and cr...
- 11:38 coordination #95857 (New): [epic] QAM incident tests: Fix "next & previous", latest results and label carry-over
- 11:23 coordination #95857 (Workable): [epic] QAM incident tests: Fix "next & previous", latest results and label carry-over
- 11:17 coordination #95857 (Workable): [epic] QAM incident tests: Fix "next & previous", latest results and label carry-over
- ## Motivation
For QAM incident tests we should consider using flavor rather than build to encode incident+test to en... - 10:17 action #95854 (Rejected): Grafana doesn't show information during some minutes, but also we got alerts on the CPU after the recovery
- ## Motivation
On 2021-07-22 10:14 we can grafana is not showing getting any results of the Webui summary ping
https... - 09:15 action #95746 (Workable): Identify likely "sporadic" openQA tests with "openqa-investigate" size:M
- 07:26 action #95822: qa-maintenance/openQABot failed to trigger aggregate tests with "urllib.error.HTTPError: HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error"
- On qam2 I manually triggered `systemctl -M openqabot start openqabot-full` which finished after about 20m, ~3k jobs t...
- 07:03 action #95822 (Resolved): qa-maintenance/openQABot failed to trigger aggregate tests with "urllib.error.HTTPError: HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error"
- ## Observation
From https://chat.suse.de/channel/qem-openqa-review?msg=ifWGbs7QXfJdGJqTf
From `ssh qam2 'journa... - 07:04 action #95221: Provide more people with administrative access to services on qam2.suse.de, at least qa-maintenance/openQABot, i.e. increase bus factor size:M
- I have a couple of points:
- Allow roles, I want only access to logs, not root of the machine. Let's give access on ... - 06:23 action #95765 (Resolved): Provide more people with administrative access to services on qam2.suse.de, adding ssh keys for existing tools team members
- was verified to be working for at least two additional members. Added as onboarding step on our team's wiki as well.
2021-07-21
- 10:13 action #93522: [tools][qem] auto-approval of kgrafts and live-patches
- msmeissn wrote:
> btw, this is probably ALSO affecting the real kernel updates ... not sure if you intended it this ... - 09:24 action #92125: Move "MR" on submission tests into a separate job group
- I just found out about https://gitlab.suse.de/qa-maintenance/openQABot/-/blob/master/systemd/openqabot-mrsep.timer wh...
- 08:56 action #92125: Move "MR" on submission tests into a separate job group
- @osukup, Do you need help on this ticket? Maybe someone in the team could help you,
- 09:21 action #95765 (Feedback): Provide more people with administrative access to services on qam2.suse.de, adding ssh keys for existing tools team members
- I added the SSH keys from https://gitlab.suse.de/openqa/salt-pillars-openqa/-/blob/master/sshd/users.sls to both qam....
- 08:26 action #95765: Provide more people with administrative access to services on qam2.suse.de, adding ssh keys for existing tools team members
- As the problem was raised again in a different context vpelcak provided me access and I can add th ssh keys of everyo...
- 08:26 action #95765 (Resolved): Provide more people with administrative access to services on qam2.suse.de, adding ssh keys for existing tools team members
- ## Motivation
There were multiple people trying to understand why some jobs were scheduled or not scheduled by qa-ma... - 09:06 action #95742 (Resolved): In openqa-investigate jobs add URL to original job as setting
- Following https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests?match=:investigate:I can find jobs like [opensuse-Tumbleweed-DVD-x86_64-g...
2021-07-20
- 15:00 coordination #94105: [epic] Use feedback from openqa-investigate to automatically inform on github pull requests, open tickets, weed out automatically failed tests
- subtasks provided, more can created based on the provided examples.
- 14:29 coordination #94105: [epic] Use feedback from openqa-investigate to automatically inform on github pull requests, open tickets, weed out automatically failed tests
- #91773 might be related, might help.
- 14:59 action #95746 (Resolved): Identify likely "sporadic" openQA tests with "openqa-investigate" size:M
- ## Motivation
Using [openqa-investigate](https://github.com/os-autoinst/scripts/blob/master/README.md#openqa-investi... - 14:19 action #95742 (Feedback): In openqa-investigate jobs add URL to original job as setting
- https://github.com/os-autoinst/scripts/pull/89
- 14:14 action #95742 (Resolved): In openqa-investigate jobs add URL to original job as setting
- ## Motivation
To be able to find for which original job an openqa-investigate job was triggered we should put the or... - 11:09 action #93522: [tools][qem] auto-approval of kgrafts and live-patches
- btw, this is probably ALSO affecting the real kernel updates ... not sure if you intended it this way.
(as real ke... - 08:11 action #95503 (Resolved): qam.suse.de api returns 500(Internal Server Error) for requests with valid logs
- mr merged, resolving
2021-07-19
- 14:27 action #95254: [teregen] Out of memory exception during template generation
- Yes, apparently this is a non-repeating issue (yet?). If I recall correctly, qam2 has 8GB of RAM, we can probably ask...
- 14:22 action #94661: [teregen] template generator - make sure to skip SUSE:Updates:openSUSE-* release targets for test report generation
- If I am not mistaken, we just need to introduces two fixes. One for legacy code (https://gitlab.suse.de/qa-maintenanc...
- 10:37 action #94027: MTUI - traceback when connecting unavailable refhost
- Hi Vit,
okurz wrote:
> […] Can you help me to provide "steps to reproduce"?
I took a look myself and tried to ... - 06:17 action #91674 (Resolved): SUSE QE Tools process proposal: Go further on regression fixing
- With the received feedback we confirmed that the proposal was seen by at least a part of the team. Calling ticket "Re...
2021-07-16
- 14:03 action #88536: Find out differences in openQA test coverage with metabase
- A more recent example of what can be done with metabase:
![which_openQA_testsuites_and_test_modules_fail_the_most_... - 09:05 action #95335 (Resolved): openqa-review: Only send the openqa_suse_de_status to openqa-suse-status@suse.de, ignore all others size:S
- That looks much better: http://mailman.suse.de/mlarch/SuSE/openqa-suse-status/2021/openqa-suse-status.2021.07/maillis...
2021-07-15
- 14:11 action #91674: SUSE QE Tools process proposal: Go further on regression fixing
- me too
- 13:36 action #91674: SUSE QE Tools process proposal: Go further on regression fixing
- Seems good to me.
- 13:22 action #91674 (Feedback): SUSE QE Tools process proposal: Go further on regression fixing
- In https://progress.opensuse.org/projects/qa/wiki/Wiki/diff?utf8=%E2%9C%93&version=268&version_from=267&commit=View+d...
- 11:18 action #91674 (Workable): SUSE QE Tools process proposal: Go further on regression fixing
- During SUSE QE Tools estimation session we agreed that it's "workable" and I can take it. There were no clear objecti...
- 09:36 action #92125: Move "MR" on submission tests into a separate job group
- As it shows we rely heavily on the previous knowledge of individuals hence we effectively can not treat this with hig...
- 09:33 action #95503: qam.suse.de api returns 500(Internal Server Error) for requests with valid logs
- We updated the due date because his absence and the ticket appeared in our exceeding due-date alerts page.
2021-07-14
- 14:32 action #95503: qam.suse.de api returns 500(Internal Server Error) for requests with valid logs
- Initial testing completed. Some results are given in the attached file.
Removing `Draft` from mr, ready to be revi... - 11:45 action #95503: qam.suse.de api returns 500(Internal Server Error) for requests with valid logs
- A merge request for this exists in https://gitlab.suse.de/qa-maintenance/qamapi/-/merge_requests/3.
The solution ... - 11:41 action #95503 (Resolved): qam.suse.de api returns 500(Internal Server Error) for requests with valid logs
- ## Observation
See ticket in parent tracker: https://gitlab.suse.de/qa-maintenance/qamapi/-/issues/5
## Accepta... - 11:32 action #94588: [qem] dashboard.qam.suse.de to be included in approval qam-openqa
- It seems one feature that we will need no matter what is an API endpoint in the dashboard that returns a list of all ...
- 10:59 action #94486 (Resolved): Complete and deploy testreport db and page on smelt
- Deployed. Can be found at https://smelt.suse.de/reports/ under `Maintenance Testreports`.
- 10:38 action #95335: openqa-review: Only send the openqa_suse_de_status to openqa-suse-status@suse.de, ignore all others size:S
- I took the liberty to address the other issue: https://gitlab.suse.de/openqa/openqa-review/-/merge_requests/9
- 10:11 action #95335: openqa-review: Only send the openqa_suse_de_status to openqa-suse-status@suse.de, ignore all others size:S
- https://gitlab.suse.de/openqa/openqa-review/-/merge_requests/8
- 09:15 action #94661 (Feedback): [teregen] template generator - make sure to skip SUSE:Updates:openSUSE-* release targets for test report generation
- @jbaier_cz we tried to estimate the ticket in the team but found it unfeasible to do so without you :) Please help us...
2021-07-13
- 13:36 action #95335 (Feedback): openqa-review: Only send the openqa_suse_de_status to openqa-suse-status@suse.de, ignore all others size:S
- Updated pipeline var:
```yaml
reviews:
- html_target_file: openqa_suse_de_status.html
# the same with custo... - 13:04 action #95335 (In Progress): openqa-review: Only send the openqa_suse_de_status to openqa-suse-status@suse.de, ignore all others size:S
- https://github.com/os-autoinst/openqa_review/pull/169
- 09:24 action #95221 (Workable): Provide more people with administrative access to services on qam2.suse.de, at least qa-maintenance/openQABot, i.e. increase bus factor size:M
- 09:16 action #95254: [teregen] Out of memory exception during template generation
- We could not estimate it in a feasible way without relying on jbaier_cz and due to his absence this will take a bit l...
- 08:43 action #94588 (New): [qem] dashboard.qam.suse.de to be included in approval qam-openqa
- ok, I am not sure if this is enough information to get going and I don't see it as something we can include in our ba...
- 08:36 action #94588: [qem] dashboard.qam.suse.de to be included in approval qam-openqa
- just communicate :)
- 08:30 action #94588: [qem] dashboard.qam.suse.de to be included in approval qam-openqa
- good point. So really only the scheduling component, i.e. currently qa-maintenance/openQABot, would know. Meaning tha...
- 08:27 action #94588: [qem] dashboard.qam.suse.de to be included in approval qam-openqa
- Be aware of the race: Do not accept any review that isn't fully scheduled yet. I assume the dashboard doesn't know if...
- 08:23 action #94588: [qem] dashboard.qam.suse.de to be included in approval qam-openqa
- hurhaj wrote:
> okurz wrote:
> > Sorry, I don't understand it enough. Could you either explain `what defines "to be... - 07:13 action #94588: [qem] dashboard.qam.suse.de to be included in approval qam-openqa
- okurz wrote:
> Sorry, I don't understand it enough. Could you either explain `what defines "to be approved" in this ...
2021-07-12
- 17:32 action #95335: openqa-review: Only send the openqa_suse_de_status to openqa-suse-status@suse.de, ignore all others size:S
- Hint #1: there are multiple reviews targeting openqa.suse.de, none of them has explicit mail recipient so the default...
- 08:53 action #95335 (Workable): openqa-review: Only send the openqa_suse_de_status to openqa-suse-status@suse.de, ignore all others size:S
- 13:26 action #94588: [qem] dashboard.qam.suse.de to be included in approval qam-openqa
- Sorry, I don't understand it enough. Could you either explain `what defines "to be approved" in this context?` withou...
- 11:35 action #94588: [qem] dashboard.qam.suse.de to be included in approval qam-openqa
- Well, "the bot" currently has logic what needs to be green for approval - and this is fetched from openQA. But that i...
- 10:55 action #94588: [qem] dashboard.qam.suse.de to be included in approval qam-openqa
- yes, #94588#note-7 sounds like a good start. But first I would like to clarify further:
coolo wrote:
> * Have a s... - 09:41 action #94588: [qem] dashboard.qam.suse.de to be included in approval qam-openqa
- So the solution will be what Coolo suggested in #94588#note-7?
As already mentioned, I do not have preference in t...
2021-07-11
- 08:34 action #95335 (Resolved): openqa-review: Only send the openqa_suse_de_status to openqa-suse-status@suse.de, ignore all others size:S
- ## Motivation
http://mailman.suse.de/mlarch/SuSE/openqa-suse-status/2021/openqa-suse-status.2021.07/maillist.html sh...
2021-07-09
- 17:44 action #92851 (Resolved): Workshop series proposal "How SUSE QE teams review openQA test results"
- So we got another topic this morning, two more firm submissions and another couple promises. And there have been repe...
- 16:51 action #93710: Reference individual openqa-review reports in gitlab CI artifacts, e.g. using gitlab pages
- cdywan wrote:
> There was a mention of a short link service, but nothing is documented or commented in a persistent ... - 11:31 action #93710 (Resolved): Reference individual openqa-review reports in gitlab CI artifacts, e.g. using gitlab pages
- cdywan wrote:
> So I re-triggered, and re-ran locally to see what would happen but I couldn't reproduce it - it almo... - 13:31 action #94486: Complete and deploy testreport db and page on smelt
- Bumping due date to Monday, since it's when the deployment of the new feature will take place.
- 10:13 action #95287 (Rejected): [tools][retrospective] CircleCI seems very slow recently
- ## Motivation
From retrospective 2021-07-09. We want to keep CI-specific implementations to a minimum to be able to ... - 08:46 action #95033 (Resolved): openqa-review fails upon trying to access openqa with no-urlencoded addresses
- https://gitlab.suse.de/openqa/openqa-review/-/pipelines/167220
- 08:30 action #95254: [teregen] Out of memory exception during template generation
- I don't know the current memory assignment for qam2.suse.de but if it's rather low I suggest to simply ask for more m...
- 08:21 coordination #93871: [epic] support process improvement in maintenance requests: packages from different code streams with identical fix sets/features in a single incident
- We need to clarify what is needed and what can be done without relying on single individuals hence unassigning osukup...
2021-07-08
- 17:04 action #93710: Reference individual openqa-review reports in gitlab CI artifacts, e.g. using gitlab pages
- So it turned out one of the reports was (is) actually missing, and the logs kinda look like it wasn't run in the firs...
- 14:11 action #95254 (Resolved): [teregen] Out of memory exception during template generation
- # Problem description
A problem during generating S:M:20293:244297 occurred, the script end up with Out of memory ... - 08:26 action #95221: Provide more people with administrative access to services on qam2.suse.de, at least qa-maintenance/openQABot, i.e. increase bus factor size:M
- ph03nix wrote:
> Perhaps those logs can be made internally accessible without administrative access as a simple dire... - 07:49 action #95221: Provide more people with administrative access to services on qam2.suse.de, at least qa-maintenance/openQABot, i.e. increase bus factor size:M
- What would helpful as a first step is to have access to the logs of the scheduling job runs. In some cases (perhaps e...
- 07:15 action #95221 (Resolved): Provide more people with administrative access to services on qam2.suse.de, at least qa-maintenance/openQABot, i.e. increase bus factor size:M
- ## Motivation
There were multiple people trying to understand why some jobs were scheduled or not scheduled by qa-ma...
2021-07-07
- 14:47 action #93943 (Resolved): openqa-review pipeline fails accessing OSD test overview pages sometimes, more retries?
- 14:40 action #93943: openqa-review pipeline fails accessing OSD test overview pages sometimes, more retries?
- cdywan wrote:
> I retried [several pipelines](https://gitlab.suse.de/openqa/openqa-review/-/jobs) which ran at diffe... - 14:35 action #93943: openqa-review pipeline fails accessing OSD test overview pages sometimes, more retries?
- okurz wrote:
> Yes, very good progress. Thank you! If the next "nightly" job is again problematic we can consider ye... - 10:03 action #94486 (Feedback): Complete and deploy testreport db and page on smelt
- 09:56 action #93838: Use new OBS SCM integration to trigger OBS checks on pull/merge requests for our projects
- I think this ticket is too big and should be split into a Proof of Concept, where we try out the OBS feature for one ...
- 09:25 action #95000 (Resolved): Remove SUSE-internal links to line teams in our team roster which should not be needed size:XS
- we agreed in the daily-extension (multiple persons) that we can just go ahead with that. Updated the wiki
- 08:28 action #91356 (Resolved): Save openqa-review reports as gitlab CI artifacts
- See #91356#note-25 . If the custom domain is not feasible we don't need it. https://openqa.io.suse.de/openqa-review/ ...
- 08:19 action #93522 (Resolved): [tools][qem] auto-approval of kgrafts and live-patches
- We assume that this is fixed because there is a more recent release from smelt, the ticket description does not state...
- 07:51 action #93799: teregen: Improvement of usability of disabled testcases notification size:M
- points from #93799#note-4 have been addressed hence removing due-date
2021-07-06
- 20:09 action #93943: openqa-review pipeline fails accessing OSD test overview pages sometimes, more retries?
- Yes, very good progress. Thank you! If the next "nightly" job is again problematic we can consider yet another point ...
- 17:15 action #93943 (Feedback): openqa-review pipeline fails accessing OSD test overview pages sometimes, more retries?
- Moving to *Feedback* again and reducing *Priority* accordingly. I"ll leave the *due date*, though, and intend to chec...
- 16:54 action #93943: openqa-review pipeline fails accessing OSD test overview pages sometimes, more retries?
- Also for further reference, I artifically tested that the report continues if all individual results fail. It will fa...
- 13:38 action #93943: openqa-review pipeline fails accessing OSD test overview pages sometimes, more retries?
- > * https://gitlab.suse.de/openqa/openqa-review/-/jobs/483641 shows "WARNING: Uploading artifacts as "archive" to coo...
- 13:28 action #93943: openqa-review pipeline fails accessing OSD test overview pages sometimes, more retries?
- I'm also testing with an increased timeout for individual requests, because I noticed that we end up retrying without...
- 13:12 action #93943 (In Progress): openqa-review pipeline fails accessing OSD test overview pages sometimes, more retries?
- Ack, I forgot to change it back. I'm having a bit more success with reproducing the specific issues but it seems to.....
- 12:51 action #93943: openqa-review pipeline fails accessing OSD test overview pages sometimes, more retries?
- I think this should be "In Progress" as I understand you actively work on this.
As you seem to have problems with ... - 10:00 action #93943: openqa-review pipeline fails accessing OSD test overview pages sometimes, more retries?
- Good news, I managed to reproduce a HTTPError manually and proposed a PR to handle it: https://github.com/os-autoinst...
- 08:32 action #93943: openqa-review pipeline fails accessing OSD test overview pages sometimes, more retries?
- okurz wrote:
> cdywan wrote:
> > okurz wrote:
> > > problems have actually been worsened with 60ebc73 from https:/... - 20:07 action #93710: Reference individual openqa-review reports in gitlab CI artifacts, e.g. using gitlab pages
- cdywan wrote:
> Another question, the reports don't seem to match up - do we just want to replace what's in the wiki... - 17:30 action #93710: Reference individual openqa-review reports in gitlab CI artifacts, e.g. using gitlab pages
- Another question, the reports don't seem to match up - do we just want to replace what's in the wiki? Or was somethin...
- 12:43 action #95033: openqa-review fails upon trying to access openqa with no-urlencoded addresses
- https://github.com/os-autoinst/openqa_review/pull/165 merged. Please validate in production, i.e. https://gitlab.suse...
- 07:50 action #92851: Workshop series proposal "How SUSE QE teams review openQA test results"
- Setting a due date for the end of the week, let's try and make those proposals firm
- 07:10 action #81192 (New): [tools] Migrate (upgrade or replace) qanet.qa.suse.de to a supported, current OS size:M
- moving all tickets without size confirmation by the team back to "New". The team should move the tickets back after e...
2021-07-05
- 17:59 action #93943: openqa-review pipeline fails accessing OSD test overview pages sometimes, more retries?
- cdywan wrote:
> okurz wrote:
> > problems have actually been worsened with 60ebc73 from https://github.com/os-autoi... - 12:14 action #93943: openqa-review pipeline fails accessing OSD test overview pages sometimes, more retries?
- okurz wrote:
> problems have actually been worsened with 60ebc73 from https://github.com/os-autoinst/openqa_review/p... - 17:58 action #93710: Reference individual openqa-review reports in gitlab CI artifacts, e.g. using gitlab pages
- cdywan wrote:
> I guess this is blocking on #93943 before https://openqa.io.suse.de/openqa-review/ has all variants ... - 12:34 action #93710: Reference individual openqa-review reports in gitlab CI artifacts, e.g. using gitlab pages
- I guess this is blocking on #93943 before https://openqa.io.suse.de/openqa-review/ has all variants [currently in the...
- 17:56 action #93522: [tools][qem] auto-approval of kgrafts and live-patches
- Same as in #91356#note-28 we should not fool ourselves by acting "surprised" that suddenly there is a public holiday ...
- 12:19 action #93522: [tools][qem] auto-approval of kgrafts and live-patches
- Moving *due date* due to public holidays
- 17:53 action #91356: Save openqa-review reports as gitlab CI artifacts
- @cdywan a public holiday should not "surprise" us and is a bad reason to bump our time expectation. As I already expl...
- 12:20 action #91356: Save openqa-review reports as gitlab CI artifacts
- Moving *due date* due to public holidays
- 14:43 action #95033 (Feedback): openqa-review fails upon trying to access openqa with no-urlencoded addresses
- 14:43 action #95033: openqa-review fails upon trying to access openqa with no-urlencoded addresses
- https://github.com/os-autoinst/openqa_review/pull/165
- 13:10 action #95033 (In Progress): openqa-review fails upon trying to access openqa with no-urlencoded addresses
- 12:48 action #92125: Move "MR" on submission tests into a separate job group
- next coordination meeting conducted, see notes in https://confluence.suse.com/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=723878219&...
2021-07-04
- 20:57 action #93943: openqa-review pipeline fails accessing OSD test overview pages sometimes, more retries?
- @cdywan turns out that problems have actually been worsened with 60ebc73 from https://github.com/os-autoinst/openqa_r...
Also available in: Atom