action #27853
Updated by SLindoMansilla almost 4 years ago
## Observation
openQA test in scenario sle-15-Installer-DVD-x86_64-minimal+proxy_SCC-postreg_SUSEconnect@64bit in
[suseconnect_scc](https://openqa.suse.de/tests/1248023/modules/suseconnect_scc/steps/16) shows that the test passes but the output is … suboptimal, e.g. "--list-extensions" does not list the "server applications" module even though it's there as it can be activated later on.
## Acceptance criteria
* **AC1:** There is a needle check asserting on *correct rendering* of the console UI of SUSEConnect
* <del>**AC2:** There is a soft-fail needle with a bugref for the missing server applications module -> https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064264 , being VERIFIED FIXED</del>
## Tasks
* Search for an existing UI test case. If the output layout of `SUSEConnect --list-extensions` is already tested, this ticket can be resolved. If not, the graphical output of the command needs to be tested in `suseconnect_scc`
* Add a `assert_screen` call after the "--list-extensions" call (0.1-1h)
* <del>Add a needle with soft-fail reference to the bug that nsinger create(s/d) (0.1-0.5h)</del>
## Further details
I think a needle check with `assert_screen` is correct here because even though it's about a console application we want to check the very least of "UI" here as the customer is supposed to use the same. *correct rendering* is up to the ticket assignee to decide what makes sense.
Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.suse.de/tests/latest?distri=sle&version=15&machine=64bit&test=minimal%2Bproxy_SCC-postreg_SUSEconnect&arch=x86_64&flavor=Installer-DVD)