https://progress.opensuse.org/https://progress.opensuse.org/themes/openSUSE/favicon/favicon.ico?15829177842019-07-03T13:22:58ZopenSUSE Project Management ToolopenQA Project - action #49370: Get rid of tests in "test development" that no one cares about (was: Ensure all tests in "test development" have a open ticket reference)https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/49370?journal_id=2247172019-07-03T13:22:58Zmgriessmeiermgriessmeier@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> changed from <i>Milestone 25</i> to <i>Milestone 30+</i></li></ul> openQA Project - action #49370: Get rid of tests in "test development" that no one cares about (was: Ensure all tests in "test development" have a open ticket reference)https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/49370?journal_id=2383912019-08-26T09:46:15ZSLindoMansillaslindomansilla@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Workable</i> to <i>Rejected</i></li><li><strong>Assignee</strong> set to <i>mgriessmeier</i></li></ul><p>Test development is exactly for that purpose.</p>
openQA Project - action #49370: Get rid of tests in "test development" that no one cares about (was: Ensure all tests in "test development" have a open ticket reference)https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/49370?journal_id=2383942019-08-26T09:46:31ZSLindoMansillaslindomansilla@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Estimated time</strong> set to <i>42.00 h</i></li></ul> openQA Project - action #49370: Get rid of tests in "test development" that no one cares about (was: Ensure all tests in "test development" have a open ticket reference)https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/49370?journal_id=2393122019-08-29T09:04:13Zokurzokurz@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Subject</strong> changed from <i>[functional][u] Ensure all tests in "test development" have a open ticket reference</i> to <i>[tools] Get rid of tests in "test development" that no one cares about (was: Ensure all tests in "test development" have a open ticket reference)</i></li><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Rejected</i> to <i>Workable</i></li><li><strong>Assignee</strong> changed from <i>mgriessmeier</i> to <i>okurz</i></li><li><strong>Target version</strong> deleted (<del><i>Milestone 30+</i></del>)</li></ul><p>SLindoMansilla wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Test development is exactly for that purpose.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>not sure what you mean. It seems like you did not read the ticket description. It seems you don't care about the test scenarios in "Test Development" so I propose I will – from administration point of view – delete scenarios based on my estimation where not useful anymore to achieve the goal. Speak up if you have a different idea.</p>
openQA Project - action #49370: Get rid of tests in "test development" that no one cares about (was: Ensure all tests in "test development" have a open ticket reference)https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/49370?journal_id=2399422019-08-30T14:23:41Zokurzokurz@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Project</strong> changed from <i>openQA Tests</i> to <i>openQA Project</i></li><li><strong>Category</strong> changed from <i>Enhancement to existing tests</i> to <i>Feature requests</i></li><li><strong>Assignee</strong> deleted (<del><i>okurz</i></del>)</li></ul><p><a class="user active user-mention" href="https://progress.opensuse.org/users/15">@coolo</a> do you think we should</p>
<ol>
<li>cleanup tests in "test development" as a single shot</li>
<li>implement a feature or script or bot to do this recurringly as part of a) upstream openQA or b) downstream infrastructure helper tool</li>
<li>completely ignore and live with the wasted ressources</li>
</ol>
openQA Project - action #49370: Get rid of tests in "test development" that no one cares about (was: Ensure all tests in "test development" have a open ticket reference)https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/49370?journal_id=2399872019-08-31T18:16:06Zcoolocoolo@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>From an admin point of view they are not wasting resources unless their priority is wrong or the job group is too greedy. Both can be fixed on shot - and I guess we can also eliminated jobs <em>obviously</em> old, but I for one can't judge and I can't think of any good metric. </p>
<p>So this goes back to having job group changes actually reviewed - but I really don't see this as part of the openQA backlog. Could be blocked by a Future 'Track job group yaml in git' feature in that backlog, but this one as written is really duty of those creating the entries IMO.</p>
<p>So I'd go and announce that you will remove every scenario there not having a reference october first and then do it one shot.</p>
openQA Project - action #49370: Get rid of tests in "test development" that no one cares about (was: Ensure all tests in "test development" have a open ticket reference)https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/49370?journal_id=3135282020-07-16T13:10:05Zokurzokurz@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Subject</strong> changed from <i>[tools] Get rid of tests in "test development" that no one cares about (was: Ensure all tests in "test development" have a open ticket reference)</i> to <i>Get rid of tests in "test development" that no one cares about (was: Ensure all tests in "test development" have a open ticket reference)</i></li><li><strong>Target version</strong> set to <i>Ready</i></li></ul> openQA Project - action #49370: Get rid of tests in "test development" that no one cares about (was: Ensure all tests in "test development" have a open ticket reference)https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/49370?journal_id=3179172020-08-10T15:18:20Zokurzokurz@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> changed from <i>Ready</i> to <i>future</i></li></ul>