action #36580
closed[functional][y][medium] stress test fails: undefined HASH value in ctcs2_to_junit.pm
0%
Description
Observation¶
all openQA test in the scenario sle-12-SP4-Server-DVD fail while executing the different stress tests. E.g.:
execute_test_run
With the error message:
# Test died: Can't use an undefined value as a HASH reference at /var/lib/openqa/cache/tests/sle/lib/ctcs2_to_junit.pm line 42.
Reproducible¶
Fails since Build 0246 (current job)
Further details¶
Last commit on lib/ctcs2_to_junit.pm
was 7e5c3196b2e6052ad02411c4c0d399c2d2bc7db6 at Tue Apr 24 17:27:00 2018 +0800. The last successful run was at 18th of May 2018. So maybe it is not directly related to the last change in that file.
Updated by mgriessmeier almost 6 years ago
- Due date changed from 2018-06-05 to 2018-06-19
Updated by mgriessmeier almost 6 years ago
- Subject changed from [functional][fast] stress test fails: undefined HASH value in ctcs2_to_junit.pm to [functional][y] stress test fails: undefined HASH value in ctcs2_to_junit.pm
Updated by riafarov almost 6 years ago
Updated by mgriessmeier almost 6 years ago
- Subject changed from [functional][y] stress test fails: undefined HASH value in ctcs2_to_junit.pm to [functional][y][medium] stress test fails: undefined HASH value in ctcs2_to_junit.pm
- Status changed from Workable to Feedback
Updated by okurz almost 6 years ago
merged, SLE12SP4 did not show stress test failures like the original one so I do not know what to retrigger here but a s390x zkvm test failed: https://openqa.suse.de/tests/1748913 Symptoms look different but I will retrigger nevertheless and we can use this as verification when it did not fail -> https://openqa.suse.de/tests/1752453#settings
Updated by riafarov almost 6 years ago
@okurz, original issue was on ppc64le. I suggest to resolve it as of now and aim investigation once we see these failures related to script_output again. WDYT?
Updated by okurz almost 6 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
- Target version set to Milestone 17
My point was to find at least a verification run on osd that shows that we have not horribly broken everything :) So any non-ppc64le is good enough. The s390x failed in before so was no good but I assume any stress test suffices. https://openqa.suse.de/tests/1752743 is a QAM test that just passed 3 minutes ago so I assume we are good.
Updated by okurz almost 6 years ago
- Target version changed from Milestone 17 to Milestone 17