Project

General

Profile

Actions

tickets #16702

closed

OBS Project for discord

Added by seancallaway@gmail.com about 7 years ago. Updated about 7 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
OBS
Target version:
-
Start date:
Due date:
2017-02-24
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:

Description

Hi,

I am one of a few people who are interested in creating RPM packages
of Discord (https://discordapp.com). We are currently creating these
via rpmbuild and pushing them to a self-hosted Yum repository. Can I
get a Discord project created to house both discord and discord-canary
RPM builds?

Thank you,

Sean Callaway
Username: seancallaway

Actions #1

Updated by cboltz about 7 years ago

  • Due date set to 2017-02-24
  • Category set to OBS
  • Assignee set to Anonymous
  • Private changed from Yes to No

As a sidenote - there are already discord packages in some home repos:

home:SocMinarch:discord discord
home:boombatower:branches:games:tools discord
home:boombatower:tumbleweed++ discord
home:dag_jnsson discord
home:korazin Discord

Maybe you can collaborate with those people to avoid re-inventing the wheel ;-)

Actions #2

Updated by seancallaway about 7 years ago

That's possible, I suppose. We have a fair community of users between my package of the official release and Vishal Verma's packaging of the testing/canary build, so we're just looking to be able to script things from end-to-end. For Fedora users, at least, it seems that we've become the de facto place to go to until Discord packages their own. Which, based on my discussion with their Linux folk, isn't anytime soon.

Actions #3

Updated by Anonymous about 7 years ago

  • Subject changed from OBS Project to OBS Project for discord

is this really opensource or repackaging their binary stuff?

repackaging their binary stuff would probably need a non-oss exception.

Actions #4

Updated by RBrownSUSE about 7 years ago

Asked Ciaran, CC'd Darix

Actions #5

Updated by seancallaway about 7 years ago

No, I was (mistakenly) told that we could use this for proprietary builds and could not initially (within the first 30 minutes) find anything to refute that. After the request, however, I did. However the projects linked in note#1 do make that confusing.

We've moved the build process to a self-hosted OBS instance, so this request can be closed.

Thanks!

Actions #6

Updated by Anonymous about 7 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Closed

Well the policy for the OBS says opensource builds only. there are NON-OSS exceptions (Which feed into the non-oss project for the relevant opensuse distributions) but the default is OSS only.

Closing as requested.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF