https://progress.opensuse.org/https://progress.opensuse.org/themes/openSUSE/favicon/favicon.ico?15829177842016-09-19T08:08:26ZopenSUSE Project Management ToolopenQA Project - action #13780: [tools][dashboard]Level of importance of test_suites + architectureshttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/13780?journal_id=287982016-09-19T08:08:26Zcoolocoolo@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>the scheduling <em>is</em> done by priority. And I don't think we should split job groups even further.</p>
openQA Project - action #13780: [tools][dashboard]Level of importance of test_suites + architectureshttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/13780?journal_id=288722016-09-19T14:16:42Zokurzokurz@suse.com
<ul></ul><blockquote>
<p>the scheduling <em>is</em> done by priority</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I know, that is why we can rely on this feature and set an even more fine grained priority for jobs within a job group.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>And I don't think we should split job groups even further</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I agree. I didn't think otherwise and didn't mention job groups.</p>
openQA Project - action #13780: [tools][dashboard]Level of importance of test_suites + architectureshttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/13780?journal_id=288822016-09-19T14:40:20Zcoolocoolo@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>but that's what you're doing. You split SP2 Server jobs into 7 job groups - and within that group create important and non-important jobs (whereever that line should be drawn). I'd say: no</p>
openQA Project - action #13780: [tools][dashboard]Level of importance of test_suites + architectureshttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/13780?journal_id=288882016-09-19T14:43:52Zokurzokurz@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>As stated, the original idea was by ast. IMHO it's still a good idea. I would not mind to discuss that in person. In the end, the test_suites <em>already</em> have a relative priority, it's just not shown in openQA but maybe only in some spreadsheet of RM/PM or the head of the reviewers. IMHO different levels of importance would allow to scale more, <em>maybe</em> even allow to merge together multiple job groups again.</p>
openQA Project - action #13780: [tools][dashboard]Level of importance of test_suites + architectureshttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/13780?journal_id=364822017-01-17T16:57:13Zokurzokurz@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Category</strong> set to <i>Feature requests</i></li></ul> openQA Project - action #13780: [tools][dashboard]Level of importance of test_suites + architectureshttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/13780?journal_id=452242017-03-27T15:59:03ZRBrownSUSErbrown@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Subject</strong> changed from <i>Level of importance of test_suites + architectures</i> to <i>[tools][dashboard]Level of importance of test_suites + architectures</i></li></ul> openQA Project - action #13780: [tools][dashboard]Level of importance of test_suites + architectureshttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/13780?journal_id=721482017-11-18T20:30:26Zcoolocoolo@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>Rejected</i></li></ul><p>I didn't buy the argument then and I don't buy it now.</p>