https://progress.opensuse.org/https://progress.opensuse.org/themes/openSUSE/favicon/favicon.ico?15829177842023-02-08T10:13:32ZopenSUSE Project Management ToolopenQA Infrastructure - action #124119: Conduct the migration of remaining SUSE openQA systems IPMI to new security zoneshttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/124119?journal_id=5994242023-02-08T10:13:32Zmkittlermarius.kittler@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Copied from</strong> <i><a class="issue tracker-4 status-3 priority-5 priority-high3 closed child" href="/issues/120270">action #120270</a>: Conduct the migration of SUSE openQA systems IPMI from Nbg SRV1 to new security zones size:M</i> added</li></ul> openQA Infrastructure - action #124119: Conduct the migration of remaining SUSE openQA systems IPMI to new security zoneshttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/124119?journal_id=5994662023-02-08T10:36:54Zokurzokurz@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Tags</strong> set to <i>infra</i></li><li><strong>Subject</strong> changed from <i>Conduct the migration of remaining SUSE openQA systems IPMI to new security zones size:M</i> to <i>Conduct the migration of remaining SUSE openQA systems IPMI to new security zones</i></li><li><strong>Assignee</strong> deleted (<del><i>mkittler</i></del>)</li><li><strong>Priority</strong> changed from <i>High</i> to <i>Normal</i></li><li><strong>Target version</strong> changed from <i>Ready</i> to <i>future</i></li></ul><p>Thank you for creating that ticket. It wasn't estimated so I will remove the <code>size:M</code>. I also assume you are not insisting on staying assigned or the priority. Also I think we can keep this outside the backlog for now.</p>
openQA Infrastructure - action #124119: Conduct the migration of remaining SUSE openQA systems IPMI to new security zoneshttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/124119?journal_id=6715912023-09-11T11:58:37Zlivdywanliv.dywan@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>I assume malbec host up alerts are related to this ticket as per the description?</p>
<p><a href="http://stats.openqa-monitor.qa.suse.de/alerting/grafana/host_up_alert_malbec/view?orgId=1" class="external">http://stats.openqa-monitor.qa.suse.de/alerting/grafana/host_up_alert_malbec/view?orgId=1</a></p>
openQA Infrastructure - action #124119: Conduct the migration of remaining SUSE openQA systems IPMI to new security zoneshttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/124119?journal_id=6716632023-09-11T13:22:38Zokurzokurz@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>livdywan wrote in <a href="#note-3">#note-3</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I assume malbec host up alerts are related to this ticket as per the description?</p>
<p><a href="http://stats.openqa-monitor.qa.suse.de/alerting/grafana/host_up_alert_malbec/view?orgId=1" class="external">http://stats.openqa-monitor.qa.suse.de/alerting/grafana/host_up_alert_malbec/view?orgId=1</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>No. But <a class="issue tracker-4 status-3 priority-5 priority-high3 closed" title="action: malbec.arch.suse.de not reachable anymore (Resolved)" href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/135515">#135515</a></p>
openQA Infrastructure - action #124119: Conduct the migration of remaining SUSE openQA systems IPMI to new security zoneshttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/124119?journal_id=7390632023-11-28T10:31:33Zokurzokurz@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>Resolved</i></li><li><strong>Assignee</strong> set to <i>okurz</i></li><li><strong>Target version</strong> changed from <i>future</i> to <i>Ready</i></li></ul><p>With NUE1 decommissioned all active systems are in new security zones and I guess machines that are brought (back) into production will also end up in new security zones. No specific work for improving error reporting here was done and I don't think we need to improve that further. We need to rely on SUSE-IT to monitor their firewall accordingly.</p>