https://progress.opensuse.org/https://progress.opensuse.org/themes/openSUSE/favicon/favicon.ico?15829177842021-12-20T07:38:14ZopenSUSE Project Management ToolopenQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4745942021-12-20T07:38:14Zosukup
<ul></ul><p>probably the best approach will be port patches from cpanminus repository to current package.</p>
<p>+- I found two relevant commits in repo</p>
<p>and then with new release update to new stable</p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4747112021-12-20T09:38:40Zosukup
<ul><li><strong>Assignee</strong> set to <i>osukup</i></li></ul> openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4748342021-12-20T15:07:21Zkraihsebastian.riedel@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>I don't think we ever even used <code>Module::Signature</code> with <code>cpanm</code>. You're getting worked up about nothing.</p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4748372021-12-20T15:12:54Zkraihsebastian.riedel@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>But there are security best practices we should enforce, such as the use of a trusted mirror, and strict HTTPS connections. I don't think we do either at the moment.</p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4748432021-12-20T15:16:18Zkraihsebastian.riedel@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>The most trusted and generally very fast (CDN backed) mirror is <code>https://cpan.metacpan.org</code>. It's what the Mojolicious installation one-liners use (<code>curl -L https://cpanmin.us | perl - -M https://cpan.metacpan.org -n Mojolicious</code>). If the package was not in openSUSE anymore we could switch to <code>curl</code>. But of course installing via <code>zypper</code> would be slightly better for security.</p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4748522021-12-20T15:26:59Zkraihsebastian.riedel@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>I'll start by making a PR that fixes all current uses of cpanm to use the bare minimum security best practices. (Not assigning the ticket to me, but assume i'm on it...)</p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4748612021-12-20T15:39:05Zkraihsebastian.riedel@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>Opened a PR. <a href="https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/4421" class="external">https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/4421</a></p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4748682021-12-20T16:35:40Zkraihsebastian.riedel@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>And merged. That means all our uses of <code>cpanm</code> are now through a trusted HTTPS mirror and reasonably secure.</p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4750872021-12-21T10:54:46Ztinitatina.mueller+trick-redmine@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>I asked miyagawa here when a release is planned: <a href="https://github.com/miyagawa/cpanminus/pull/636#issuecomment-998678526" class="external">https://github.com/miyagawa/cpanminus/pull/636#issuecomment-998678526</a></p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4751792021-12-21T14:08:59Zosukup
<ul></ul><p>Upstream stopped releasing cpanminus on CPAN with version 1.7044 , git has tagged 1.9017 and devel version reports 1.9020</p>
<p>So I repacked perl-App-cpanminus with devel version - sr: <a href="https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/941820" class="external">https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/941820</a></p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4752152021-12-21T17:20:02Ztinitatina.mueller+trick-redmine@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>I tried out the package from <a href="https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/941820">https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/941820</a></p>
<p>There are some differences to the current rpm package. Some cpanminus files are missing, and Menlo files are additional. not sure if this is how it should work:</p>
<pre><code>% rpm -ql perl-App-cpanminus [p5.26.3] 17:50:25
/usr/bin/cpanm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/App
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/App/cpanminus
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/App/cpanminus.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/App/cpanminus.pod
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/App/cpanminus/Dependency.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/App/cpanminus/fatscript.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/App/cpanminus/script.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/x86_64-linux-thread-multi
/usr/share/doc/packages/perl-App-cpanminus
/usr/share/doc/packages/perl-App-cpanminus/Changes
/usr/share/doc/packages/perl-App-cpanminus/README
/usr/share/licenses/perl-App-cpanminus
/usr/share/licenses/perl-App-cpanminus/LICENSE
/usr/share/man/man1/cpanm.1.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/App::cpanminus.3pm.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/App::cpanminus::fatscript.3pm.gz
% rpm -ql perl-App-cpanminus-1.9020-0.noarch.rpm [p5.26.3] 17:50:27
/usr/bin/cpanm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/App
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/App/cpanminus
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/App/cpanminus.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/App/cpanminus/script.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo/Builder
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo/Builder/Static.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo/CLI
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo/CLI/Compat.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo/Dependency.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo/Index
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo/Index/MetaCPAN.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo/Index/MetaDB.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo/Index/Mirror.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo/Legacy.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo/Util.pm
/usr/share/doc/packages/perl-App-cpanminus
/usr/share/doc/packages/perl-App-cpanminus/Changes
/usr/share/doc/packages/perl-App-cpanminus/README.md
/usr/share/licenses/perl-App-cpanminus
/usr/share/licenses/perl-App-cpanminus/LICENSE
/usr/share/man/man1/cpanm.1.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/App::cpanminus.3pm.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/Menlo.3pm.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/Menlo::Builder::Static.3pm.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/Menlo::CLI::Compat.3pm.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/Menlo::Index::MetaCPAN.3pm.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/Menlo::Index::MetaDB.3pm.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/Menlo::Legacy.3pm.gz
</code></pre>
<p>We are still hoping that the author is replying to us about his release plans.</p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4754282021-12-22T10:15:41Zkraihsebastian.riedel@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>Spoke with upstream, a new <code>App::cpanminus</code> should be released soon and the <code>--verify</code> functionality will probably be deprecated completely.</p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4758012021-12-23T10:21:09Zkraihsebastian.riedel@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Description</strong> updated (<a title="View differences" href="/journals/475801/diff?detail_id=450127">diff</a>)</li></ul> openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4764632021-12-28T08:30:53Zlivdywanliv.dywan@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>In Progress</i></li></ul><p>I give in. I'm updating the status now</p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4765922021-12-29T04:11:12Zopenqa_reviewopenqa-review@suse.de
<ul><li><strong>Due date</strong> set to <i>2022-01-12</i></li></ul><p>Setting due date based on mean cycle time of SUSE QE Tools</p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4772612022-01-04T09:17:59Zosukup
<ul></ul><p>tinita wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I tried out the package from <a href="https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/941820">https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/941820</a></p>
<p>There are some differences to the current rpm package. Some cpanminus files are missing, and Menlo files are additional. not sure if this is how it should work:</p>
<pre><code>% rpm -ql perl-App-cpanminus [p5.26.3] 17:50:25
/usr/bin/cpanm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/App
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/App/cpanminus
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/App/cpanminus.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/App/cpanminus.pod
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/App/cpanminus/Dependency.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/App/cpanminus/fatscript.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/App/cpanminus/script.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/x86_64-linux-thread-multi
/usr/share/doc/packages/perl-App-cpanminus
/usr/share/doc/packages/perl-App-cpanminus/Changes
/usr/share/doc/packages/perl-App-cpanminus/README
/usr/share/licenses/perl-App-cpanminus
/usr/share/licenses/perl-App-cpanminus/LICENSE
/usr/share/man/man1/cpanm.1.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/App::cpanminus.3pm.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/App::cpanminus::fatscript.3pm.gz
% rpm -ql perl-App-cpanminus-1.9020-0.noarch.rpm [p5.26.3] 17:50:27
/usr/bin/cpanm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/App
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/App/cpanminus
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/App/cpanminus.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/App/cpanminus/script.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo/Builder
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo/Builder/Static.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo/CLI
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo/CLI/Compat.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo/Dependency.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo/Index
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo/Index/MetaCPAN.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo/Index/MetaDB.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo/Index/Mirror.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo/Legacy.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.34.0/Menlo/Util.pm
/usr/share/doc/packages/perl-App-cpanminus
/usr/share/doc/packages/perl-App-cpanminus/Changes
/usr/share/doc/packages/perl-App-cpanminus/README.md
/usr/share/licenses/perl-App-cpanminus
/usr/share/licenses/perl-App-cpanminus/LICENSE
/usr/share/man/man1/cpanm.1.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/App::cpanminus.3pm.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/Menlo.3pm.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/Menlo::Builder::Static.3pm.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/Menlo::CLI::Compat.3pm.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/Menlo::Index::MetaCPAN.3pm.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/Menlo::Index::MetaDB.3pm.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/Menlo::Legacy.3pm.gz
</code></pre>
<p>We are still hoping that the author is replying to us about his release plans.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>current package is fatpack with everything in one file , on other hand new is normal perl package </p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4807202022-01-17T17:04:56Zlivdywanliv.dywan@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Due date</strong> changed from <i>2022-01-12</i> to <i>2022-01-21</i></li></ul><blockquote>
<a name="Acceptance-criteria"></a>
<h2 >Acceptance criteria<a href="#Acceptance-criteria" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>AC1:</strong> openQA is not vulnerable to any of the mentioned CVEs</li>
<li><strong>AC2:</strong> The package <code>perl-App-cpanminus</code> has not been removed from Factory (or we are using an alternative like <code>curl -L https://cpanmin.us | perl - -M https://cpan.metacpan.org ...</code>)</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p><a class="user active user-mention" href="https://progress.opensuse.org/users/21806">@osukup</a> @sriedel So where are we at?</p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4810182022-01-18T14:59:11Zosukup
<ul></ul><p>cdywan wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<a name="Acceptance-criteria"></a>
<h2 >Acceptance criteria<a href="#Acceptance-criteria" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>AC1:</strong> openQA is not vulnerable to any of the mentioned CVEs</li>
<li><strong>AC2:</strong> The package <code>perl-App-cpanminus</code> has not been removed from Factory (or we are using an alternative like <code>curl -L https://cpanmin.us | perl - -M https://cpan.metacpan.org ...</code>)</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p><a class="user active user-mention" href="https://progress.opensuse.org/users/21806">@osukup</a> @sriedel So where are we at?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>AC1: my SR solves this<br>
AC2:</p>
<p>1) delete request was rejected/postponed<br>
2) my SR to Factoryt repapackage devel version of cpanm ( as is used by upstream, which stopped publishing cpanm on CPAN )</p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4810212022-01-18T15:00:42Zosukup
<ul></ul><p>updated SR contains removal of checksum functions</p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4813302022-01-19T08:31:39Zlivdywanliv.dywan@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>osukup wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>updated SR contains removal of checksum functions</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/947240" class="external">https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/947240</a> This?</p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4813752022-01-19T09:28:33Zosukup
<ul></ul><p>cdywan wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>osukup wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>updated SR contains removal of checksum functions</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/947240" class="external">https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/947240</a> This?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>ja :D</p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4835972022-01-25T11:58:02Zosukup
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>In Progress</i> to <i>Feedback</i></li></ul><p>.. for next step it needs SR accepted and forwarded to Factory ( Then submitted to Leap)</p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4836892022-01-25T15:33:05Ztinitatina.mueller+trick-redmine@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>See:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/miyagawa/cpanminus/pull/636" class="external">https://github.com/miyagawa/cpanminus/pull/636</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/miyagawa/cpanminus/issues/639" class="external">https://github.com/miyagawa/cpanminus/issues/639</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/miyagawa/cpanminus/pull/638" class="external">https://github.com/miyagawa/cpanminus/pull/638</a></li>
</ul>
<p>So Miyagawa says the feature will be removed (PR 638).<br>
Unfortunately there is still no release, but we could try to backport the patch to the current tarball, it seems simple enough.<br>
But I also asked him again what the plans are.</p>
<p>I vote against <a href="https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/947240" class="external">https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/947240</a> , and there were several comments from me and others on this and the previous request <a href="https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/941820" class="external">https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/941820</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>current package is fatpack with everything in one file , on other hand new is normal perl package</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That's not the only difference.</p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4836922022-01-25T15:43:11Zkraihsebastian.riedel@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>tinita wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>See:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/miyagawa/cpanminus/pull/636" class="external">https://github.com/miyagawa/cpanminus/pull/636</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/miyagawa/cpanminus/issues/639" class="external">https://github.com/miyagawa/cpanminus/issues/639</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/miyagawa/cpanminus/pull/638" class="external">https://github.com/miyagawa/cpanminus/pull/638</a></li>
</ul>
<p>So Miyagawa says the feature will be removed (PR 638).<br>
Unfortunately there is still no release, but we could try to backport the patch to the current tarball, it seems simple enough.<br>
But I also asked him again what the plans are.</p>
<p>I vote against <a href="https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/947240" class="external">https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/947240</a> , and there were several comments from me and others on this and the previous request <a href="https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/941820" class="external">https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/941820</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>I'm with Tina on this.</p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4846802022-01-27T11:09:34Ztinitatina.mueller+trick-redmine@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>A new release was just made: <a href="https://metacpan.org/dist/App-cpanminus" class="external">https://metacpan.org/dist/App-cpanminus</a> 1.7045</p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4846892022-01-27T11:41:28Zosukup
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Feedback</i> to <i>In Progress</i></li></ul><p>with new release thanks to <a class="user active user-mention" href="https://progress.opensuse.org/users/33482">@tinita</a> --> on Friday 28.1 is excepted to be in devel project and created ticket to Factory</p>
<p>in middle of next week accepted into Factory and then we can create MR to Leap 15.3 with in +- 10 days released as Maint Update for leap</p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4849142022-01-27T16:50:44Zosukup
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>In Progress</i> to <i>Feedback</i></li></ul> openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4849622022-01-27T17:57:04Zlivdywanliv.dywan@suse.com
<ul></ul><p><a class="user active user-mention" href="https://progress.opensuse.org/users/21806">@osukup</a> If we're waiting on something that'll happen in ~10 days I would think Feb 11 seems like a good due date, because by then we should be able to have this verified and resolved.</p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4850852022-01-28T09:26:32Ztinitatina.mueller+trick-redmine@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Due date</strong> changed from <i>2022-01-21</i> to <i>2022-02-11</i></li></ul><p>Request for Factory: <a href="https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/949627" class="external">https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/949627</a></p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4856012022-01-31T12:39:23Zosukup
<ul></ul><p>SR to factory accepted</p>
<p>MR to Leap 15.3 <a href="https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/950151" class="external">https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/950151</a></p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4862492022-02-02T11:28:00Zlivdywanliv.dywan@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>osukup wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>SR to factory accepted</p>
<p>MR to Leap 15.3 <a href="https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/950151" class="external">https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/950151</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>I see a build issue <code>unresolvable: nothing provides perl(aliased)</code> for i586. Are you looking into it? Or is this expected?</p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4875752022-02-07T09:39:38Zosukup
<ul></ul><p>cdywan wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>osukup wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>SR to factory accepted</p>
<p>MR to Leap 15.3 <a href="https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/950151" class="external">https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/950151</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>I see a build issue <code>unresolvable: nothing provides perl(aliased)</code> for i586. Are you looking into it? Or is this expected?<br>
i586 isnt supported :D</p>
</blockquote>
<p>btw accepted as openSUSE:Maintenance:17366 </p>
openQA Project - action #104164: The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:Mhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/104164?journal_id=4895152022-02-10T11:26:10Zlivdywanliv.dywan@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Subject</strong> changed from <i>The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA</i> to <i>The openSUSE package perl-App-cpanminus was suggested for removal but we rely on it within openQA size:M</i></li><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Feedback</i> to <i>Resolved</i></li></ul><p>Both ACs are fulfilled, the package no longer has the unwanted features and remains in factory</p>