openSUSE Project Management Tool: Issueshttps://progress.opensuse.org/https://progress.opensuse.org/themes/openSUSE/favicon/favicon.ico?15829177842022-07-18T11:16:56ZopenSUSE Project Management Tool
Redmine openQA Infrastructure - action #113716 (Resolved): [qe-core] proxy-scc is downhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/1137162022-07-18T11:16:56Zmaritawernermawerner@suse.com
<p>On Friday, July 15, at 10.45 the proxy-scc stopped working. A Jira SD ticket for eng infra was raised by QE: <a href="https://sd.suse.com/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/SD-92678" class="external">https://sd.suse.com/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/SD-92678</a></p>
<p>In the slack channel help-scc Jiri Novak and Thomas Schmidt from the SCC team discussed the technical details:<br>
<a href="https://suse.slack.com/archives/C02AYV7UJSD/p1657792209257829" class="external">https://suse.slack.com/archives/C02AYV7UJSD/p1657792209257829</a></p>
<p>In short: the very old caasp cluster will be replaced by a Kubernetes instance.</p>
qe-yam - action #104223 (Closed): Remove soft-fail when bug was fixedhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/1042232021-12-21T12:20:00Zmaritawernermawerner@suse.com
<p>In the openQA status report a number <br>
(<a href="https://openqa.io.suse.de/openqa-review/openqa_sle15_yast_status.html" class="external">https://openqa.io.suse.de/openqa-review/openqa_sle15_yast_status.html</a>)<br>
of softfails have bugs assigned that are already fixed:</p>
<ul>
<li><p>textmode@s390x-zVM-vswitch-l3<br>
<a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/7857197" class="external">https://openqa.suse.de/tests/7857197</a><br>
-> <a href="https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142040" class="external">https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142040</a> (Ticket status: VERIFIED (FIXED), prio/severity: P3/Major, assignee: <a href="mailto:gfx-enterprise-bugs@suse.de">gfx-enterprise-bugs@suse.de</a>)</p></li>
<li><p><a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/7857191" class="external">https://openqa.suse.de/tests/7857191</a> -> bsc#1142146 <a href="https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142146" class="external">https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142146</a> (Ticket status: RESOLVED (FIXED), prio/severity: P5/Normal, assignee: <a href="mailto:yast-internal@suse.de">yast-internal@suse.de</a>)</p></li>
<li><p>yast2_firstboot <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/7857852" class="external">https://openqa.suse.de/tests/7857852</a> -> boo#1120256 <a href="https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1120256" class="external">https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1120256</a> (Ticket status: RESOLVED (WORKSFORME), prio/severity: P3/Normal, assignee: <a href="mailto:dracut-maintainers@suse.de">dracut-maintainers@suse.de</a>)</p></li>
<li><p>yast2_ncurses_gnome <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/7870893" class="external">https://openqa.suse.de/tests/7870893</a> -> bsc#1083487 <a href="https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083487" class="external">https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083487</a> (Ticket status: RESOLVED (FIXED), prio/severity: P2/Major, assignee: <a href="mailto:security-team@suse.de">security-team@suse.de</a>)</p></li>
</ul>
openQA Tests - action #43724 (Resolved): [sle][security] Bug 1110700 - remove non-enterprise ser...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/437242018-11-13T10:37:53Zmaritawernermawerner@suse.com
<p>Is it possible to write a testcase to make sure that the Bug does not happen again?<br>
<a href="https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110700" class="external">https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110700</a></p>
<p>If it is moe a bug for the Qa security team please relabel.</p>
openQA Tests - coordination #34924 (Rejected): [PjM][epic][tools] Share openQA Hardware between S...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/349242018-04-13T13:34:14Zmaritawernermawerner@suse.com
<p>I discussed that topic shortly with Santi. Good ideas but needs definitely a decision from Coolo & other openSUSe people.</p>
openQA Tests - action #25812 (Rejected): [sle][functional]offline installation with ALL-Modules DVDhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/258122017-10-06T07:48:44Zmaritawernermawerner@suse.com
<p>For an offline installation a medium with all modules will be provided. The installer itself will not be on the medium.<br>
This medium is an ALL-Modules DVD.</p>
openQA Tests - action #25722 (Resolved): [migration] a simple installation with SMThttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/257222017-10-02T13:05:14Zmaritawernermawerner@suse.com
<p>Installations are tested with SCC/proxySCC. To make sure that SMT also works fine we have to do 1 simple installation with an SMT.</p>
openQA Tests - action #15546 (Resolved): [Migration] Combine both online and offline upgrades int...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/155462016-12-19T07:45:24Zmaritawernermawerner@suse.com
<p>As we decided in the mgmt offsite we want to have all migration scenarios in 1 Jobgroup.</p>
<p>BUT:</p>
<p>Open questions:</p>
<ul>
<li>who will be in the migration subgroup and do the daily review?</li>
<li>coordinator?</li>
</ul>
openQA Tests - action #15112 (Resolved): [Migration] SLES: minimal necessary patcheshttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/151122016-11-29T07:52:06Zmaritawernermawerner@suse.com
<p>Online migration is performed with the default installation and with full-patched installations.<br>
Online migration with minimal necessary patches is still missing.</p>
openQA Tests - action #15110 (Resolved): [Online migration] SLES and SLED: SP2->SP3https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/151102016-11-29T07:51:39Zmaritawernermawerner@suse.com
<p>TBD</p>
openQA Tests - action #14720 (Resolved): [migration][sp3][aarch64] add offline migration scenario...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/147202016-11-09T15:00:30Zmaritawernermawerner@suse.com
<p>With SP3 we need to add the offline migration scenarios from SP2 to SP3 for aarch64 as well.</p>
openQA Tests - action #14718 (Resolved): [Migration] [SP3]add offline migration scenarios SP2->SP...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/147182016-11-09T14:59:09Zmaritawernermawerner@suse.com
<p>With SP3 we need to add the offline migration scenarios from SP2 to SP3.</p>
<p>As long as we do not have a PRD or other requirements we copy the SP1->SP2 scenarios and adjust them.</p>
<p>ATM we only have x86_64 and ppc64le upgrade scenarios.</p>
openQA Tests - action #11562 (Rejected): s390x: local disk, add a second diskhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/115622016-04-11T08:25:18Zmaritawernermawerner@suse.com
<p>as discussed with Matthias, add a Testcae with a second disk</p>
openQA Tests - action #11510 (Closed): SLE HA - add system role https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/115102016-04-06T07:23:09Zmaritawernermawerner@suse.com
<p><a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/333661/modules/addon_products_sle/steps/4" class="external">https://openqa.suse.de/tests/333661/modules/addon_products_sle/steps/4</a></p>
openQA Tests - action #11444 (Closed): Feature 318101: Show user defined comments in grub2 menu f...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/114442016-04-01T12:56:05Zmaritawernermawerner@suse.com
<p>For details see <a href="https://fate.suse.com/318101" class="external">https://fate.suse.com/318101</a></p>
<p>First check if the Feature status is "done".</p>
openQA Tests - action #11434 (Resolved): [sle][functional][fate#314829][fate:validation][medium] ...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/114342016-04-01T12:48:14Zmaritawernermawerner@suse.com
<p>For details see <a href="https://fate.suse.com/314829" class="external">https://fate.suse.com/314829</a></p>
<a name="Situation"></a>
<h2 >Situation<a href="#Situation" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<p>Currently, SLES support installation with root on raid (software raid 1), however this is limited for UEFI machines, where it seems very reasonable to have also "/boot/efi" on raid 1, thus preventing issues when disk on which "/boot/efi" currently resides fails. In order to work properly, this setup also needs creation of multiple entries in UEFI (using efibootmgr), thich would point to disks of which such raid device is created.</p>
<a name="Acceptance-criteria"></a>
<h2 >Acceptance criteria<a href="#Acceptance-criteria" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>AC1:</strong> A manual test has been conducted for SLE 15 as well as SLE 12 SP4 showing if a system with a UEFI boot partition on RAID is bootable or not</li>
</ul>
<a name="Tasks"></a>
<h2 >Tasks<a href="#Tasks" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<ul>
<li>Manually test with a current build of SLE15 (including storage-ng) if a system is bootable from a degraded RAID with /boot/efi on RAID</li>
<li>Do the same test for SLE12 SP4</li>
<li>Update the bug report in <a href="https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924487" class="external">bsc#924487</a></li>
<li>If possible automate the test</li>
</ul>