openSUSE Project Management Tool: Issueshttps://progress.opensuse.org/https://progress.opensuse.org/themes/openSUSE/favicon/favicon.ico?15829177842023-11-28T06:58:19ZopenSUSE Project Management Tool
Redmine ALP - action #151558 (Resolved): [security] firstrun on sle-micro >= 6.0 should be ALPifiedhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/1515582023-11-28T06:58:19Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<p>openQA test in scenario sle-micro-6.0-Default-encrypted-x86_64-container_selinux@uefi fails in<br>
<a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/12874494/modules/firstrun/steps/5" class="external">firstrun</a></p>
<p>Always latest result in this scenario: <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=sle-micro&flavor=Default-encrypted&machine=uefi&test=container_selinux&version=6.0" class="external">latest</a></p>
<p>Firstrun is failing with distri sle-micro and version 6.0 - that is, ALP - in the encrypted flavor (that does not use ignition but uses firstrun wizard). This is likely due to it picking up the SLE Micro 5.x expections while it should now work as intended on ALP. There may or may not be difference between ALP Dolomite and ALP Marble in this regard, but likely it should be largely the same.</p>
<p>selinux_setup was updated to use is_alp || is_sle_micro('>=6.0'), jeos/firstrun should maybe using is_sle || is_sle_micro('<6.0') in some places and the former in other places, not sure what would be optimal.</p>
openQA Project - action #127238 (New): It's not possible to remove own force_result comments, and...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/1272382023-04-05T06:42:05Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<p>Here is an example:</p>
<p><a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/10848924#comments" class="external">https://openqa.suse.de/tests/10848924#comments</a></p>
<p>The soft-fail forcing was done erronously, and would be wanted to be removed. However, when trying to remove the comment Forbidden message is given to the person who made the comment (the person is also Administrator).</p>
<p>This ticket looks like opposite of ticket <a class="issue tracker-4 status-1 priority-3 priority-lowest" title="action: It's possible to delete force_result comments (New)" href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/107239">#107239</a>, so I'm not sure what to do. However, in the recent months it feels there has been more related changes - now these un-deletable comments are also carried over automatically to new runs, and those carried over comments are also undeletable. If this kind of comment would happen in maintenance tests and couldn't be corrected (without availability of someone who has more direct rights than even Administrator has), it could mean even accidentally giving green light to an erronous update if the correction would be delayed.</p>
openQA Project - action #123724 (Resolved): auto_review not working despite ticket in openQA auto...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/1237242023-01-27T07:20:44Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<a name="Observation"></a>
<h2 >Observation<a href="#Observation" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<p>Ticket #122215 seems not functional still, the affected tests do not get the softfail forcing still automatically but need to be set manually daily.</p>
<p>The ticket has:<br>
<code>auto_review:"Test result is NOT same as baseline":force_result:softfailed</code><br>
... at the end of the subject, and the ticket was moved to openQA auto review project.</p>
<p>The tests can be found at the 15-SP4 runs at <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/group_overview/429" class="external">https://openqa.suse.de/group_overview/429</a></p>
<a name="Acceptance-criteria"></a>
<h2 >Acceptance criteria<a href="#Acceptance-criteria" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>AC1</strong>: Result is changed to softfailed as specified in the title of the ticket</li>
</ul>
<a name="Suggestions"></a>
<h2 >Suggestions<a href="#Suggestions" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<ul>
<li>Verify that the regex valid/working e.g. <code>auto_review:"Test result is NOT same as baseline":force_result:softfailed</code>, maybe by putting the title in a unit test and seeing if that fails</li>
<li>Check that the ticket is filed correctly, i.e. using the force result tracker - this <strong>seems</strong> to be correct</li>
<li>Check the code in <a href="https://github.com/os-autoinst/scripts" class="external">https://github.com/os-autoinst/scripts</a></li>
</ul>
openQA Project - action #119467 (Resolved): "Internal server error" on opening any job group fron...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/1194672022-10-27T06:00:25Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<a name="Observation"></a>
<h2 >Observation<a href="#Observation" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<p>Build specific pages etc work, but job group front page like <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/group_overview/268" class="external">https://openqa.suse.de/group_overview/268</a> does not.</p>
<a name="Acceptance-criteria"></a>
<h2 >Acceptance criteria<a href="#Acceptance-criteria" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>AC1:</strong> No obvious related regression on OSD</li>
<li><strong>AC2:</strong> Test coverage for the branding button code exists for both the job comments as well as job group comments</li>
</ul>
openQA Tests - action #93210 (New): [migration][qe-core] sssd openldap/389-ds basic testing, modi...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/932102021-05-28T08:22:13Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<p>In ticket 89479 the goals for QE Core were fulfilled to modernize directory service testing. However, QE Migration would also like to test sssd with openldap (older SLE) and 389-ds (newer SLE) and testing how the functionality remains after upgrade to newer SLE.</p>
<p>There is a draft design for such tests at <a href="https://confluence.suse.com/display/qasleapac1/Draft+service+check+design+and+implementation" class="external">https://confluence.suse.com/display/qasleapac1/Draft+service+check+design+and+implementation</a> - once there it is fully agreed that we want to go ahead with such architecture, this test, which is probably one of the more important migration tests, should be modified towards that. Whether done by people from QE Core or QE Migration is likely depending on a resource issue, now that developer of 89479 is moving to yet another squad. Community contribution would be of course always welcome as well, although for that the design plan should be incorporated to this ticket. tl;dr; divide the test to 1. install_service, 2. configure_service, 3. enable_service, 4. start_service, 5. check_service, 6. check_function, of which 1-6 are done before distro upgrade and 5-6 after. Maybe it could be possibly to do just division to two steps, and execute either both or just the latter? Ticket will be updated once the draft solidifies.</p>
<a name="Further-Information"></a>
<h2 >Further Information<a href="#Further-Information" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<p>See discussion at <a href="https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/pull/12528" class="external">https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/pull/12528</a> and <a href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/89479" class="external">https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/89479</a></p>
<a name="Acceptance-Criteria"></a>
<h2 >Acceptance Criteria<a href="#Acceptance-Criteria" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<p>AC1: Modify test so that it continues to execute as is, but is split so that distro upgrade (migration) tests can be also run using the same module.</p>
openQA Tests - coordination #91193 (New): [epic][qe-core][qem] Add existing console Product QE te...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/911932021-04-15T06:23:53Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<p>After comparing test coverage of SLE 15 SP2 and SP3 in opneQA I identified several tests that are exclusive to either pre-release or post-release testing and could be easily used to increase our coverage just by using what we already have.</p>
<p>It is possible that are some errors and some of the tests from the list are already being used. It is also just my opinion, therefor review from other colleagues is more then welcome.</p>
<p>These are the console tests that run only before release and could be used also after the release (product QE -> QEM)</p>
<p><del>tests/console/btrfsmaintenance.pm (runs on mau-filesystem)</del><br>
<del>tests/console/journald_fss.pm</del><br>
<del>tests/console/lvm_thin_check.pm</del><br>
tests/console/ndctl.pm<br>
<del>tests/console/network_hostname.pm</del><br>
tests/console/nvme_checks.pm<br>
<del>tests/console/openvswitch_ssl.pm</del><br>
tests/console/snapper_cleanup_timeline.pm<br>
tests/console/systemd_nspawn.pm<br>
tests/console/verify_default_target.pm<br>
tests/console/verify_network.pm<br>
<del>tests/console/vsftpd.pm</del></p>
<a name="Acceptance-criteria"></a>
<h2 >Acceptance criteria<a href="#Acceptance-criteria" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>AC1</strong> All aforementioned tests are scheduled in maintenance tests (aggregated or incidents), in their corresponding categories (When in doubt ask in qe-core channel)</li>
<li><strong>AC2</strong> Cross reference with <a href="https://github.com/ge0r/openQA-module-mapper" class="external">openqa-module-mapper</a> to figure what's already done and what's running where.</li>
<li><strong>AC3</strong> If a test module needs black magic to work (i.e, takes more than half a day), a corresponding ticket is created and it is removed from this list.</li>
</ul>
openQA Tests - action #91190 (New): [kernel][qem] Add existing btrfs-progs Product QE tests to QEMhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/911902021-04-15T06:23:06Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<p>After comparing test coverage of SLE 15 SP2 and SP3 in opneQA I identified several tests that are exclusive to either pre-release or post-release testing and could be easily used to increase our coverage just by using what we already have.</p>
<p>It is possible that are some errors and some of the tests from the list are already being used. It is also just my opinion, therefor review from other colleagues is more then welcome.</p>
<p>These are the btrfs-progs tests that run only before release and could be used also after the release (product QE -> QEM)</p>
<p>tests/btrfs-progs/generate_report.pm<br>
tests/btrfs-progs/install.pm<br>
tests/btrfs-progs/run.pm</p>
openQA Tests - action #91184 (Rejected): [qe-core] Add existing network QEM tests to Product QEhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/911842021-04-15T06:17:20Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<p>After comparing test coverage of SLE 15 SP2 and SP3 in opneQA I identified several tests that are exclusive to either pre-release or post-release testing and could be easily used to increase our coverage just by using what we already have.</p>
<p>It is possible that are some errors and some of the tests from the list are already being used. It is also just my opinion, therefor review from other colleagues is more then welcome.</p>
<p>These are the tests that run only after release and could be used also before the release (QEM -> product QE)</p>
<p>tests/network/autofs_client.pm & tests/network/autofs_server.pm<br>
tests/network/salt_master.pm<br>
tests/network/salt_minion.pm<br>
tests/network/samba/samba_adcli.pm</p>
openQA Tests - action #91181 (Resolved): [qe-core] Add existing console QEM tests to Product QEhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/911812021-04-15T06:16:21Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<p>After comparing test coverage of SLE 15 SP2 and SP3 in opneQA I identified several tests that are exclusive to either pre-release or post-release testing and could be easily used to increase our coverage just by using what we already have.</p>
<p>It is possible that are some errors and some of the tests from the list are already being used. It is also just my opinion, therefor review from other colleagues is more then welcome.</p>
<p>These are the console tests that run only after release and could be used also before the release (QEM -> product QE)</p>
<p>tests/console/bind.pm<br>
tests/console/dracut_enhanced.pm<br>
tests/console/gd.pm<br>
tests/console/iotop.pm<br>
tests/console/journalctlLevels.pm<br>
tests/console/krb5.pm<br>
tests/console/libgcrypt.pm<br>
tests/console/libssh.pm<br>
tests/console/openssl_nodejs.pm<br>
tests/console/perf.pm<br>
tests/console/rsync_client.pm<br>
tests/console/rsync_server.pm<br>
tests/console/systemd_rpm_macros.pm<br>
tests/console/valgrind.pm</p>
openQA Tests - action #91178 (Rejected): [kernel-default][qem] Add existing kernel Product QE tes...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/911782021-04-15T06:14:00Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<p>After comparing test coverage of SLE 15 SP2 and SP3 in opneQA I identified several tests that are exclusive to either pre-release or post-release testing and could be easily used to increase our coverage just by using what we already have.</p>
<p>It is possible that are some errors and some of the tests from the list are already being used. It is also just my opinion, therefor review from other colleagues is more then welcome.</p>
<p>These are the kernel tests that run only before release and could be used also after the release (product QE -> QEM)</p>
<p>tests/kernel/blktests.pm<br>
tests/kernel/kdump.pm<br>
tests/kernel/numa_irqbalance.pm<br>
tests/kernel/pressure_stall_information.pm<br>
tests/kernel/tuned.pm</p>
openQA Tests - action #90329 (Resolved): [qe-core] 15SP2 QU - test fails in raid_gpt on ppc64lehttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/903292021-03-19T09:14:39Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<a name="Observation"></a>
<h2 >Observation<a href="#Observation" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<p>openQA test in scenario sle-15-SP2-Full-QR-ppc64le-RAID0@ppc64le-no-tmpfs fails in<br>
<a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/5696096/modules/raid_gpt/steps/99" class="external">raid_gpt</a></p>
<p>This used to work earlier, now complains about "select at least two devices" so something has changed. Whether it's a test issue (this ticket) or product bug (to be filed if investigation shows that) is to be seen.</p>
<p>These steps look equal so I'm not sure why it fails:<br>
fail: <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/latest?arch=ppc64le&distri=sle&flavor=Full-QR&machine=ppc64le-no-tmpfs&test=RAID0&version=15-SP2#step/raid_gpt/96" class="external">https://openqa.suse.de/tests/latest?arch=ppc64le&distri=sle&flavor=Full-QR&machine=ppc64le-no-tmpfs&test=RAID0&version=15-SP2#step/raid_gpt/96</a><br>
pass: <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/5446298#step/raid_gpt/96" class="external">https://openqa.suse.de/tests/5446298#step/raid_gpt/96</a></p>
<a name="Test-suite-description"></a>
<h2 >Test suite description<a href="#Test-suite-description" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<p>Maintainer: slindomansilla, jrauch</p>
<p>Installation of RAID0 using expert partitioner</p>
<a name="Reproducible"></a>
<h2 >Reproducible<a href="#Reproducible" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<p>Fails since (at least) Build <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/5653559" class="external">383.6</a></p>
<a name="Expected-result"></a>
<h2 >Expected result<a href="#Expected-result" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<p>Last good: <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/5446298" class="external">383.6</a> (or more recent)</p>
<a name="Further-details"></a>
<h2 >Further details<a href="#Further-details" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<p>Always latest result in this scenario: <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/latest?arch=ppc64le&distri=sle&flavor=Full-QR&machine=ppc64le-no-tmpfs&test=RAID0&version=15-SP2" class="external">latest</a></p>
openQA Infrastructure - action #90275 (Resolved): Replacement openQA OSD aarch64 hardware (was: D...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/902752021-03-18T10:29:54Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<a name="Motivation"></a>
<h2 >Motivation<a href="#Motivation" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<p>We have had a machine from orthos, but we need to renew the lease every now and then or lose it. It would be easier to have a more permanent solution for eg snapshot validations.</p>
<p>openQA tests aarch64 on KVM, this ticket would be about improving the baremetal aarch64 testing. We were not able to test RC1 on baremetal (non-rpi) aarch64 due to lack of access to hardware (eg problems on thunderx10)</p>
<a name="Acceptance-criteria"></a>
<h2 >Acceptance criteria<a href="#Acceptance-criteria" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>AC1</strong>: <strong>DONE</strong> Make new arm machines available</li>
<li><strong>AC2</strong>: openqaworker-arm-4 is salted and processing jobs</li>
<li><strong>AC3</strong>: openqaworker-arm-5 is salted and processing jobs</li>
</ul>
openQA Tests - action #57584 (Resolved): [qam] test fails in evolution_setup_servers - dovecot n...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/575842019-10-01T11:52:32Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<p>After <a href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/56273" class="external">https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/56273</a> got fixed, the evolution_setup_servers is now failing, a rerun done first at <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/3397700" class="external">https://openqa.suse.de/tests/3397700</a> and a newer one at <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/3424806" class="external">https://openqa.suse.de/tests/3424806</a></p>
<p>"No provider of 'dovecot' found." at <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/3397700#step/evolution_prepare_servers/18" class="external">https://openqa.suse.de/tests/3397700#step/evolution_prepare_servers/18</a></p>
<p>qam-regression-message is currently disabled, <a href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/57260" class="external">https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/57260</a> is about re-enabling it once the issues are all fixed.</p>
openQA Project - action #56789 (New): New needles from git repository not working with openqa-clo...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/567892019-09-11T08:14:09Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<p>Use case:</p>
<p>To be able to test tests in production (openqa.opensuse.org or openqa.suse.de) before merging the needles and tests themselves, since results have proven to vary on those loaded machines compared to local openQA instance or VM.</p>
<p>It is currently working if there are no new needles involved, but this issue describes the problem with custom needles which would be theoretically supported by openqa-clone-custom-git-refspec but not working in practice.</p>
<p>Problem description:</p>
<p>First of all, documentation [1] says "Path to needles subdirectory to use, defaults to "needles" within PRODUCTDIR. Can be a git repository URL, comparable to CASEDIR", and CASEDIR states "for example <a href="mailto:git@github.com">git@github.com</a>:os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse.git#feature/test".</p>
<p>[1] <a href="https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst/blob/master/doc/backend_vars.asciidoc" class="external">https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst/blob/master/doc/backend_vars.asciidoc</a></p>
<p>However,</p>
<pre><code>openqa-clone-custom-git-refspec https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/pull/8332 https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/xxxxxxxx --apikey=XXX --apisecret=XXX NEEDLES_DIR=git@github.com:tjyrinki/os-autoinst-needles-opensuse.git#poo-12345
</code></pre>
<p>results in:</p>
<pre><code>Could not create directory '/var/lib/empty/.ssh'.
Host key verification failed.
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
</code></pre>
<p>Using https instead (NEEDLES_DIR=<a href="https://github.com/tjyrinki/os-autoinst-needles-opensuse.git" class="external">https://github.com/tjyrinki/os-autoinst-needles-opensuse.git</a>) gets one further, but openQA complains about wrong needles location:</p>
<pre><code>init needles from /var/lib/openqa/pool/15/os-autoinst-needles-opensuse
Needle /var/lib/openqa/pool/15/os-autoinst-needles-opensuse/ssh-login-ok-20160813.json is not under project directory /var/lib/openqa/cache/xxx at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/needle.pm line 63.
</code></pre>
<p>Oliver Kurz suggested playing around with the PRODUCTDIR to try to workaround the forbidding use of (correctly checked out) needles dir which I did but it didn't get any better with trying to set that to eg pool/... directories, which also changes on every run.</p>
openQA Tests - action #50867 (Resolved): [qam] nfsidmap part of the autofs tests fail on SLE12https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/508672019-04-30T07:30:08Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<a name="Observation"></a>
<h2 >Observation<a href="#Observation" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<pre><code class="bash syntaxhl" data-language="bash">nfsidmap <span class="nt">-c</span>
<span class="s1">'id_resolver'</span> keyring was not found
</code></pre>
<a name="Reproducible"></a>
<h2 >Reproducible<a href="#Reproducible" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<ul>
<li>Build <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/2844872#step/autofs_client/39" class="external">20190430</a>
In scenario sle-12-SP3-Server-DVD-Updates-x86_64-1-mau-autofs-server@64bit</li>
</ul>
<a name="Expected-results"></a>
<h2 >Expected results<a href="#Expected-results" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<p>I cannot find any expected result in OSD, so I consider this a new test.</p>
<a name="Further-information"></a>
<h2 >Further information<a href="#Further-information" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<p>Latest job in this scenario: <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/latest?test=mau-autofs-server&flavor=Server-DVD-Updates&arch=x86_64&distri=sle&version=12-SP3&machine=64bit" class="external">https://openqa.suse.de/tests/latest?test=mau-autofs-server&flavor=Server-DVD-Updates&arch=x86_64&distri=sle&version=12-SP3&machine=64bit</a></p>