openSUSE Project Management Tool: Issueshttps://progress.opensuse.org/https://progress.opensuse.org/themes/openSUSE/favicon/favicon.ico?15829177842024-03-15T07:34:18ZopenSUSE Project Management Tool
Redmine openQA Tests - action #157306 (Workable): [security][QU] seahorse_sshkey fails to enable WE exten...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/1573062024-03-15T07:34:18Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<p>openQA test in scenario sle-15-SP5-Online-QR-x86_64-fips_env_mode_tests_crypt_x11@64bit fails in<br>
<a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/13708414/modules/seahorse_sshkey/steps/18" class="external">seahorse_sshkey</a></p>
<p>This was earlier attributed to <a href="https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217071" class="external">https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217071</a> but it has been reportedly fixed also in 15-SP5 now.</p>
openQA Tests - action #156658 (Feedback): [security][QU] audit_remote_libvirt fails in 15-SP5 due...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/1566582024-03-05T12:43:14Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<p>This seems similar to ticket <a class="issue tracker-4 status-3 priority-4 priority-default closed" title="action: [security][15-SP6] Update test audit_remote_libvirt for new libvirt behaviour (Resolved)" href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/137627">#137627</a> which was at the time only done for 15-SP6.</p>
<p>openQA test in scenario sle-15-SP5-Online-QR-x86_64-cc_audit-remote-libvirt@64bit fails in<br>
<a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/13708530/modules/audit_remote_libvirt/steps/13" class="external">audit_remote_libvirt</a></p>
<p>Last good: <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/13102161" class="external">127.10</a> (or more recent)</p>
<p>Always latest result in this scenario: <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=sle&flavor=Online-QR&machine=64bit&test=cc_audit-remote-libvirt&version=15-SP5" class="external">latest</a></p>
<a name="Acceptance-Criteria"></a>
<h2 >Acceptance Criteria<a href="#Acceptance-Criteria" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<ol>
<li>Fix audit_remove_libvirt to pass also on 15-SP5.</li>
</ol>
openQA Tests - action #152897 (Feedback): [security][qu] SCC_REGCODE_LIVE not defined in QU test ...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/1528972023-12-22T11:48:20Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<p>openQA test in scenario sle-15-SP5-Online-QR-x86_64-fips_ker_mode_tests_crypt_tool@64bit fails in<br>
<a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/13123377/modules/suseconnect/steps/3" class="external">suseconnect</a></p>
<p>The new suseconnect test module needs SCC_REGCODE_LIVE, but for some reason this is not defined in QU. This is likely to be fixed in medium types settings.</p>
<p>The variable is included in 15-SP6 (<a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/13085715#" class="external">https://openqa.suse.de/tests/13085715#</a>) and maintenance (<a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/13134299#" class="external">https://openqa.suse.de/tests/13134299#</a>), and in those cases the module passes.</p>
openQA Tests - action #152671 (Blocked): [security][slem] dirmngr_setup and dirmngr_daemon need t...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/1526712023-12-15T09:49:55Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<p>dirmngr_setup tries to use zypper so likely misses ALP compatibility, possibly completely (not just is_slemicro >= 6.0 but also is_alp in general missing).</p>
<p>We have not yet executed this same test module on Dolomite.</p>
<p>openQA test in scenario sle-micro-6.0-Default-x86_64-fips_ker_mode_tests_crypt_core@uefi fails in<br>
<a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/13062087/modules/dirmngr_setup/steps/25" class="external">dirmngr_setup</a></p>
ALP - action #151558 (Resolved): [security] firstrun on sle-micro >= 6.0 should be ALPifiedhttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/1515582023-11-28T06:58:19Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<p>openQA test in scenario sle-micro-6.0-Default-encrypted-x86_64-container_selinux@uefi fails in<br>
<a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/12874494/modules/firstrun/steps/5" class="external">firstrun</a></p>
<p>Always latest result in this scenario: <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=sle-micro&flavor=Default-encrypted&machine=uefi&test=container_selinux&version=6.0" class="external">latest</a></p>
<p>Firstrun is failing with distri sle-micro and version 6.0 - that is, ALP - in the encrypted flavor (that does not use ignition but uses firstrun wizard). This is likely due to it picking up the SLE Micro 5.x expections while it should now work as intended on ALP. There may or may not be difference between ALP Dolomite and ALP Marble in this regard, but likely it should be largely the same.</p>
<p>selinux_setup was updated to use is_alp || is_sle_micro('>=6.0'), jeos/firstrun should maybe using is_sle || is_sle_micro('<6.0') in some places and the former in other places, not sure what would be optimal.</p>
openQA Tests - action #133766 (Blocked): [security][QU] selinux test fails in audit2allow on both...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/1337662023-08-03T13:24:13Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<p>In 15-SP5 QU:</p>
<p>openQA test in scenario sle-15-SP5-Online-QR-x86_64-selinux@64bit fails in<br>
<a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/11730010/modules/audit2allow/steps/20" class="external">audit2allow</a></p>
<p>This started happening in 15-SP4 already, but has not happened always:</p>
<p>openQA test in scenario sle-15-SP4-Online-QR-x86_64-selinux@64bit fails in<br>
<a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/11624079/modules/audit2allow/steps/20" class="external">audit2allow</a></p>
<p>Fails since (at least) Build <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/11575626" class="external">191.4</a></p>
<p>Last good: <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/11052257" class="external">190.2</a> (or more recent)</p>
<p>(15-SP5) Always latest result in this scenario: <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=sle&flavor=Online-QR&machine=64bit&test=selinux&version=15-SP5" class="external">latest</a></p>
<a name="Acceptance-Criteria"></a>
<h2 >Acceptance Criteria<a href="#Acceptance-Criteria" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<ol>
<li>Find out what is going wrong, is it a product change between SP4 190.2 and 191.4 builds, or something in tests that changed?</li>
<li>Adjust the test suitably (or file a product bug), and test on 15-SP5 (15-SP4 not needed since no new QUs there)</li>
</ol>
openQA Project - action #127238 (New): It's not possible to remove own force_result comments, and...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/1272382023-04-05T06:42:05Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<p>Here is an example:</p>
<p><a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/10848924#comments" class="external">https://openqa.suse.de/tests/10848924#comments</a></p>
<p>The soft-fail forcing was done erronously, and would be wanted to be removed. However, when trying to remove the comment Forbidden message is given to the person who made the comment (the person is also Administrator).</p>
<p>This ticket looks like opposite of ticket <a class="issue tracker-4 status-1 priority-3 priority-lowest" title="action: It's possible to delete force_result comments (New)" href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/107239">#107239</a>, so I'm not sure what to do. However, in the recent months it feels there has been more related changes - now these un-deletable comments are also carried over automatically to new runs, and those carried over comments are also undeletable. If this kind of comment would happen in maintenance tests and couldn't be corrected (without availability of someone who has more direct rights than even Administrator has), it could mean even accidentally giving green light to an erronous update if the correction would be delayed.</p>
openQA Tests - action #124931 (Resolved): [security][QU] 15-SP4 fips_install_lvm_encrypt_seprate_...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/1249312023-02-22T10:05:07Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<a name="Observation"></a>
<h2 >Observation<a href="#Observation" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<p>openQA test in scenario sle-15-SP4-Online-QR-x86_64-fips_install_lvm_encrypt_separate_boot@64bit fails in<br>
<a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/10551434/modules/first_boot/steps/9" class="external">first_boot</a> (Always latest result in this scenario: <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=sle&flavor=Online-QR&machine=64bit&test=fips_install_lvm_encrypt_separate_boot&version=15-SP4" class="external">latest</a>) Last good: <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/9997617" class="external">171.2</a> (or more recent)</p>
<p>This is likely due to the changes by YaM (YaST) team.</p>
openQA Project - action #123724 (Resolved): auto_review not working despite ticket in openQA auto...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/1237242023-01-27T07:20:44Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<a name="Observation"></a>
<h2 >Observation<a href="#Observation" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<p>Ticket #122215 seems not functional still, the affected tests do not get the softfail forcing still automatically but need to be set manually daily.</p>
<p>The ticket has:<br>
<code>auto_review:"Test result is NOT same as baseline":force_result:softfailed</code><br>
... at the end of the subject, and the ticket was moved to openQA auto review project.</p>
<p>The tests can be found at the 15-SP4 runs at <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/group_overview/429" class="external">https://openqa.suse.de/group_overview/429</a></p>
<a name="Acceptance-criteria"></a>
<h2 >Acceptance criteria<a href="#Acceptance-criteria" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>AC1</strong>: Result is changed to softfailed as specified in the title of the ticket</li>
</ul>
<a name="Suggestions"></a>
<h2 >Suggestions<a href="#Suggestions" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<ul>
<li>Verify that the regex valid/working e.g. <code>auto_review:"Test result is NOT same as baseline":force_result:softfailed</code>, maybe by putting the title in a unit test and seeing if that fails</li>
<li>Check that the ticket is filed correctly, i.e. using the force result tracker - this <strong>seems</strong> to be correct</li>
<li>Check the code in <a href="https://github.com/os-autoinst/scripts" class="external">https://github.com/os-autoinst/scripts</a></li>
</ul>
openQA Tests - action #120964 (Resolved): [security][qem] test fails in SLE 12-SP5 sssd_openldap_...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/1209642022-11-25T11:31:38Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<a name="Observation"></a>
<h2 >Observation<a href="#Observation" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<p>openQA test in scenario sle-12-SP5-Server-DVD-Updates-x86_64-sssd_openldap_functional@64bit fails in<br>
<a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/10038120/modules/sssd_openldap_functional/steps/1" class="external">sssd_openldap_functional</a></p>
<p>Times out at or around/after "Refreshing service 'container-suseconnect-zypp'." Happens both on x86_64 and aarch64.</p>
<a name="Further-details"></a>
<h2 >Further details<a href="#Further-details" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<p>Always latest result in this scenario: <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=sle&flavor=Server-DVD-Updates&machine=64bit&test=sssd_openldap_functional&version=12-SP5" class="external">latest</a></p>
<a name="Suggestion"></a>
<h2 >Suggestion<a href="#Suggestion" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<p>Line 48 in sssd_openldap_functional.pm should probably have longer timeout than 600.</p>
openQA Project - action #119467 (Resolved): "Internal server error" on opening any job group fron...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/1194672022-10-27T06:00:25Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<a name="Observation"></a>
<h2 >Observation<a href="#Observation" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<p>Build specific pages etc work, but job group front page like <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/group_overview/268" class="external">https://openqa.suse.de/group_overview/268</a> does not.</p>
<a name="Acceptance-criteria"></a>
<h2 >Acceptance criteria<a href="#Acceptance-criteria" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>AC1:</strong> No obvious related regression on OSD</li>
<li><strong>AC2:</strong> Test coverage for the branding button code exists for both the job comments as well as job group comments</li>
</ul>
openQA Tests - action #115169 (Resolved): [security][qem] test fails in scan_audit_logshttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/1151692022-08-10T10:00:23Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<p>openQA test in scenario sle-15-SP3-Server-DVD-Updates-x86_64-yast2_apparmor@64bit fails in<br>
<a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/9298856/modules/scan_audit_logs/steps/63" class="external">scan_audit_logs</a></p>
<p>Fails since (at least) Build <a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/9298856" class="external">20220809-1</a> (current job)</p>
<hr>
<p>The 'nscd' text is highlighted for some reason. Trying out with new needle scan_audit_logs-AppArmor-Scan-Audit-logs-allow-20220810.</p>
openQA Infrastructure - action #90275 (Resolved): Replacement openQA OSD aarch64 hardware (was: D...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/902752021-03-18T10:29:54Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<a name="Motivation"></a>
<h2 >Motivation<a href="#Motivation" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<p>We have had a machine from orthos, but we need to renew the lease every now and then or lose it. It would be easier to have a more permanent solution for eg snapshot validations.</p>
<p>openQA tests aarch64 on KVM, this ticket would be about improving the baremetal aarch64 testing. We were not able to test RC1 on baremetal (non-rpi) aarch64 due to lack of access to hardware (eg problems on thunderx10)</p>
<a name="Acceptance-criteria"></a>
<h2 >Acceptance criteria<a href="#Acceptance-criteria" class="wiki-anchor">¶</a></h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>AC1</strong>: <strong>DONE</strong> Make new arm machines available</li>
<li><strong>AC2</strong>: openqaworker-arm-4 is salted and processing jobs</li>
<li><strong>AC3</strong>: openqaworker-arm-5 is salted and processing jobs</li>
</ul>
openQA Tests - action #58673 (Resolved): libqt5_qtbase fails on 15 SP2https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/586732019-10-25T06:31:45Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<p>The new test just merged seems to be working elsewhere but needles fail on 15 SP2.</p>
<p><a href="https://openqa.suse.de/tests/3527794" class="external">https://openqa.suse.de/tests/3527794</a></p>
openQA Project - action #56789 (New): New needles from git repository not working with openqa-clo...https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/567892019-09-11T08:14:09Ztjyrinki_susetjyrinki+redmine@suse.de
<p>Use case:</p>
<p>To be able to test tests in production (openqa.opensuse.org or openqa.suse.de) before merging the needles and tests themselves, since results have proven to vary on those loaded machines compared to local openQA instance or VM.</p>
<p>It is currently working if there are no new needles involved, but this issue describes the problem with custom needles which would be theoretically supported by openqa-clone-custom-git-refspec but not working in practice.</p>
<p>Problem description:</p>
<p>First of all, documentation [1] says "Path to needles subdirectory to use, defaults to "needles" within PRODUCTDIR. Can be a git repository URL, comparable to CASEDIR", and CASEDIR states "for example <a href="mailto:git@github.com">git@github.com</a>:os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse.git#feature/test".</p>
<p>[1] <a href="https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst/blob/master/doc/backend_vars.asciidoc" class="external">https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst/blob/master/doc/backend_vars.asciidoc</a></p>
<p>However,</p>
<pre><code>openqa-clone-custom-git-refspec https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/pull/8332 https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/xxxxxxxx --apikey=XXX --apisecret=XXX NEEDLES_DIR=git@github.com:tjyrinki/os-autoinst-needles-opensuse.git#poo-12345
</code></pre>
<p>results in:</p>
<pre><code>Could not create directory '/var/lib/empty/.ssh'.
Host key verification failed.
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
</code></pre>
<p>Using https instead (NEEDLES_DIR=<a href="https://github.com/tjyrinki/os-autoinst-needles-opensuse.git" class="external">https://github.com/tjyrinki/os-autoinst-needles-opensuse.git</a>) gets one further, but openQA complains about wrong needles location:</p>
<pre><code>init needles from /var/lib/openqa/pool/15/os-autoinst-needles-opensuse
Needle /var/lib/openqa/pool/15/os-autoinst-needles-opensuse/ssh-login-ok-20160813.json is not under project directory /var/lib/openqa/cache/xxx at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/needle.pm line 63.
</code></pre>
<p>Oliver Kurz suggested playing around with the PRODUCTDIR to try to workaround the forbidding use of (correctly checked out) needles dir which I did but it didn't get any better with trying to set that to eg pool/... directories, which also changes on every run.</p>