Project

General

Profile

Actions

action #39044

closed

coordination #39041: [functional][sle][u][epic] test fails in systemd_testsuite - Adapt test suite 'suse_patches-systemd_testsuite' for SLE 12

[functional][sle][u] Create IBS repository for SLE12-SP4 of systemd-testsuite

Added by SLindoMansilla almost 6 years ago. Updated about 4 years ago.

Status:
Rejected
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Bugs in existing tests
Target version:
Start date:
2018-08-01
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Difficulty:

Description

Acceptance criteria

  • AC: An IBS repository is available for SLE12-SP4 containing the package systemd-testsuite

Suggestions

Ask tblume if it is necessary to maintain systemd for Leap 42.3.
If so,

  • the existing OBS package has to be linked in IBS (mpluskal)
  • Submit Requests have to be sent to the Leap 42.3 OBS project
  • (and the link will automatically pull by the linked OBS package)

Available OBS package

Available IBS projects


Related issues 1 (0 open1 closed)

Blocks openQA Tests - action #39047: [functional][u][sle] Adapt the test module 'systemd_testsuite' for SLE12-SP4RejectedSLindoMansilla2018-08-01

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by SLindoMansilla almost 6 years ago

  • Blocks action #39047: [functional][u][sle] Adapt the test module 'systemd_testsuite' for SLE12-SP4 added
Actions #2

Updated by SLindoMansilla almost 6 years ago

  • Subject changed from [functional][sle] Create OBS repository for SLE12-SP4 of systemd-testsuite to [functional][sle][u] Create OBS repository for SLE12-SP4 of systemd-testsuite
Actions #3

Updated by SLindoMansilla almost 6 years ago

  • Subject changed from [functional][sle][u] Create OBS repository for SLE12-SP4 of systemd-testsuite to [functional][sle][u] Create IBS repository for SLE12-SP4 of systemd-testsuite
  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #4

Updated by okurz almost 6 years ago

  • Target version set to future

I am not sure about this one. Would it be enough if we focus on the Tumbleweed+SLE15 codestreams for now? I think fully supporting the SLE12 codestream would be of course beneficial but an additional workload which we can currently not handle. What do you think?

Actions #5

Updated by mgriessmeier about 4 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Rejected

not our scope anymore

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF