action #130369
closedcoordination #154777: [saga][epic] Shareable os-autoinst and test distribution plugins
coordination #108527: [epic] os-autoinst wheels for scalable code reuse of helper functions and segmented test distributions
[spike][timeboxed:20h] Reduce duplication of openQA-in-openQA tests in os-autoinst-distri-opensuse and os-autoinst-distri-openQA size:S
0%
Description
Motivation¶
https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/tree/master/tests/openqa started mostly as a "copy&paste" variant of https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-openQA/ as commented in
https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/pull/6595#pullrequestreview-194607032 . Recent incidents like #130201 show that we suffer from "I thought we fixed this bug already!"-problems recurringly, … who would have thought that? Let's try to evaluate what options we have regarding enfostering reuse of code, maybe use wheels here as well?
Suggestions¶
- Keep #115019 and #115013 in mind and play around with the code to see how we can reuse some or at best all code
- Optional: Find out why #130201 was hit in openSUSE Tumbleweed and not already in https://openqa.opensuse.org/group_overview/24 and if possible fix that from happening again in the future
Updated by okurz over 1 year ago
- Copied from action #130201: openqa_bootstrap: fetchneedles not called during openqa-bootstrap size:S added
Updated by jbaier_cz over 1 year ago
Optional: Find out why #130201 was hit in openSUSE Tumbleweed and not already in https://openqa.opensuse.org/group_overview/24 and if possible fix that from happening again in the future
TW in #130201 uses openqa_bootstrap script to install openQA, however openQA-in-openQA does not
Updated by jbaier_cz over 1 year ago
- Related to action #127286: Run openQA (webUI+worker) based on SLE+packagehub size:M added
Updated by jbaier_cz over 1 year ago
Related, but not exactly removing the duplication (yet): https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-openQA/pull/116
Updated by okurz over 1 year ago
- Subject changed from [spike][timeboxed:20h] Reduce duplication of openQA-in-openQA tests in os-autoinst-distri-opensuse and os-autoinst-distri-openQA to [spike][timeboxed:20h] Reduce duplication of openQA-in-openQA tests in os-autoinst-distri-opensuse and os-autoinst-distri-openQA size:S
- Status changed from New to Workable
Updated by okurz over 1 year ago
- Copied to action #132335: In openqa-in-openqa use scenario definitions instead of job group templates size:M added
Updated by livdywan about 1 year ago
- Copied to action #134390: Log proactively where wheel components are located to ease debugging size:M added
Updated by tinita about 1 year ago
- Status changed from Workable to In Progress
- Assignee set to tinita
We worked on this in our mob session today. I will commit the current state to a branch in distri-openQA and distri-opensuse
Updated by openqa_review about 1 year ago
- Due date set to 2023-09-01
Setting due date based on mean cycle time of SUSE QE Tools
Updated by tinita about 1 year ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Workable
Setting back to workable for now.
I wasn't able to commit anything because we mainly figured out in the mob session how to work with a local wheels directory, and there were other urgent tasks.
Updated by openqa_review about 1 year ago
- Due date set to 2023-10-17
Setting due date based on mean cycle time of SUSE QE Tools
Updated by tinita about 1 year ago
https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst/pull/2371 Error on non-existing WHEELS_DIR (merged)
Updated by tinita about 1 year ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Workable
Can't work on two tickets at a time
Updated by tinita about 1 year ago
I created a branch with minimal changes:
- https://github.com/perlpunk/os-autoinst-distri-openQA/tree/test-wheels
- https://github.com/perlpunk/openqa-wheels
- https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3635240
Still have to run the distri-opensuse test with that.
Updated by okurz about 1 year ago
- Due date deleted (
2023-10-17) - Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
We looked at the current situation and approach together in the tools team daily 2023-10-16 and confirmed that our design of wheels is a good way to go. We have not identified any function that should really be in the testapi directly. Continuing in #138029
Updated by okurz about 1 year ago
- Copied to action #138032: Find out most/least used testapi functions to decide about where to extend/cleanup size:M added